Hi Summer,
Sorry to see that you are having to go through something like this. Defamation can be very difficult to prove, especially for elected officials. The standard of proof is much higher than that for a private person.
“One who publishes a false and defamatory communication concerning a private person, or concerning a public official or public figure in relation to a private matter, is subject to liability, if, but only if, he (a) knows that the statement is false and it defames the other, (b) acts in reckless disregard of these matters, or (c) acts negligently in failing to ascertain them.” Antwerp Diamond Exch. of Am., Inc. v. Better Bus. Bureau of Maricopa Cnty., Inc., 130 Ariz. 523, 528, 637 P.2d 733, 738 (1981) (quoting Peagler v. Phx. News., Inc., 114 Ariz. 309, 315, 560 P.2d 1216, 1222 (1977)); see Dube v. Likins, 216 Ariz. 406, 417, 167 P.3d 93, 104 (Ct. App. 2007) (quoting Rowland v. Union Hills Cntry. Club, 157 Ariz. 301, 306, 757 P.2d 105, 110 (Ct. App. 1988)).
Truth is an affirmative defense, however, in some instances, if the defamer obtains the information illegally, then he or she can still remain liable.
In the alternative, you may be able to show a claim under false light. Arizona does recognize the tort of false light and follows Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652E. Even though the statement(s) may be true, if it portrays the plaintiff in a false light, damages can still be awarded. To establish a false light claim, a plaintiff must show that the defendant: (1) made statements about the plaintiff; (2) to the public that are; (3) “highly offensive to a reasonable person;” and (4) the defendant “had knowledge of or acted in reckless disregard as to the falsity of the publicized matter and the false light in which the [plaintiff] would be placed.” See Hart v. Seven Resorts, Inc., 947 P.2d 846 (1997); Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., 783 P.2d 781, 787 (1989).