Seems the site is randomly posting old reviews as new reviews.  A number of providers in Vegas and Phoenix when checked have no new reviews even though they are showing as updated.  Sigh.  This site which has been amazing, seems to be having some huge issues.

Amen to that my brother in arms!!! eom

I think this has been happening on the site for a long time.  what I have noticed is that when somebody submits a problem report to a bad link on an escort's website, the escort's profile will come up in the new reviews section even if they have not had a recent review.  Somebody in Phoenix probably had a lot of time on his or her hands and submitted enough problem reports to get a free month of service sinc you are credited with two days for every approved problem report.

This is the third time in a year that it has happened. Another time a review I sent for the Phoenix page got posted on the Chicago page. I should post reviews on the discussion board.

Your review of Ashley was turned down for not having enough explicit details.  

You wrote:


“She offered me something to drink and we sat on the sofa and got acquainted.  We retreated to the bedroom and that is where the girl-next-door turned into one super hot sexy young blonde.  Ashley has a tight body, remarkable breasts, yummy silver dollar nipples and sweet lips. Anyone who has read my reviews knows I refrain from details but suffice to say that his woman has all the bases covered, excellent oral skills, receives as willingly as she gives and clearly let herself enjoy her time with you (YMMV).  I will definitely repeat.”

In your words, you “refrain from details.” Unfortunately the “Juicy details” portion of the review is not the place to “refrain from details“, sorry.  In the future, instead of posting questions about your reviews being turned down on the message board (Where I do not normally look), you can find your own answers more quickly by going to “Account manager” (At the top of the screen) then clicking “My reviews” to see the status of your reviews.

Hope this helps.

David

How about letting someone know in a timely fashion. That is just stupid.

Yes you are correct in noticing many, many, discrepancy in the posted reviews-particularly in the dates.

I saw two incredibly overly flattering reviews that were totally impossible. At the time the posts were made, the lady in question had not been in the country for weeks. She was on the other side of the planet.  

However, in about six or seven weeks, PRESTO!!!
The old dates disappeared and were replace with newer dates that corresponded to a time when the lady was actually in the country. Come on, TER. Get real!

PEACE AND PROSPERITY,

Sheika Fatima





-- Modified on 1/29/2007 1:46:05 PM

It seem's TER's policy is now deny first, ask question's later.

It would be great if TER were to provide e-mail updates on reviews, but it doesn't.

Follow STAFF's advice, keep track of the status of your review, if its declined, ask why?!?  Comply if you can.  This has worked for me in all but one occasion.

I have not had any recent problewm with reviews. In fact at times they are turned around in less than a day. In the past when there was a problem staff was responsive.  Look at the TER review count there are almost 4000 new reviews and over 396,000 total reviews!  There is a lot to manage. Sorry to hear of problems, report them to TER and let them get after it.   Of course review practice  can be a lot of fun!

...when they turn down a review, and the reviewer asks for specifics, the staff offers specifics. Here's just one example: I had a slash (/)instead of a period (.) following www in a provider's website. I was told it was an unacceptable website. I repeatedly asked for specifics, and the staff repeated the same "unacceptable web site." OK, I made a mistake, but I couldn't find my error. This went on for a week. Finally Dingus was able to get me the specific info the staff could have provided at the outset. Had itt not been a first-time review of a terrific young woman other TER members would benefit from knowing about, I would have just quit.

I will say this (and then shut-up).  I don't pay for a membership, but it sounds like a lot of people DO.  That means they are customers (not members).  And from what I have been reading lately, a lot of these customers have been delivering feedback to management about their dissatisfaction with what they are getting back. I often see complaints about reviews being rejected, or simply vanishing.  

I think it is suspect when a person pays for the right to participate, and then when participation happens, they are told that their participation is not up-to-snuff.  As a businessman, I find it incredulous for another business owner to take such a position with its customers...but then again, some business owners do not see their customers AS customers.

"I think this has been happening on the site for a long time.  what I have noticed is that when somebody submits a problem report to a bad link on an escort's website, the escort's profile will come up in the new reviews section even if they have not had a recent review.  Somebody in Phoenix probably had a lot of time on his or her hands and submitted enough problem reports to get a free month of service sinc you are credited with two days for every approved problem report."

I think Mike hit the nail on the head.  There was 4 new reviews today and they all "report new website".  Someone must be just trying to accumulate 2 free membership days at a time.

One of the girl's most recent review was April of 2004.  Lol.  That's a really annoying loophole.


-- Modified on 1/31/2007 11:26:46 PM