In my most recent review the "gentleman" acts shocked at the size of my ass and that Im so bottom heavy. I believe my pics definitely give an accurate idea of my shape, not to mention my stats are 100% true. Im wondering if I should just include stats on my gallery page too so there is no confusion. His review comes across as if my pics are deceiving or something. Do you guys look at stats all the time?
Its the pics......I am sucker for a pretty face. I don't look at stats that much since the stats on a review can be inaccurate since the stats are posted by the first reviewer.
Its the pics......I am sucker for a pretty face. I don't look at stats that much since the stats on a review can be inaccurate since the stats are posted by the first reviewer.
I mainly look at pics and read the reviews since they usually describe the provider. I would Think most guys aren't that familiar with most stats for hips anyway.
Pics and stats are largely inaccurate. The pics in many cases are old and reflect a past version of the person. In addition pics can be altered to make the person look smaller or larger. Even how a person stands in a foto can make a person appear a smaller. Ladies often bend over forward to hide an unflaterring waistline
Stats are mostly erroneous. How many girls say that they weigh 115 lbs???? 115 lbs in reality is a slender woman, very few ladies weigh 115lbs. Many times when you see a lady for the first time, she may wear an outfit that purposely deceives a gentleman into think she is smaller, like a loosely fitting sun dress or a teddy that doesn't expose the waistline.
A lovely and intelligent lady brought this to my attention:
" I luv a thick woman and her lower body fits the bill nicely, but she should consider breast job to round out the package."
"Met her in a nice mid level hotel in the burbs, walked into the room a found an attractive, bubble butt late 20's young lady that I decided to give a try."
"Unfortunately, I do luv a woman with a nice rack to go along with a nice azz and it's a bit distracting to see her rather small flat chest. Thanks heaven for a nice time, but I think I will move on"
"Kiki is a quiet young girl. She is chunky in the ass and thighs with a fair amount of cellulite on them, but has very nice youthful breasts and nice legs. She met me at the door with a pair of jeans on and socks and no shoes on. I was tempted to take a pass, but decided to take chance..."
"Angie came in the room and I was very disappointment. Some one mentioned that she has an overbite in a preview, that would be putting it mildy. I was pretty turned off, but decided to go thru with the appointment. Overall the service was good, but I just couldn't get into and couldn't wait to get out of there."
And if you read through all of them, you can see that they have negativity throughout
It seem you are not happy with any ones looks. Perhaps do better research next time or be more tactful in stating your opinion of a lady who treats you very well.
I always look at both. It is soooo common to see the pics of a slender girl, then stats don't jive, or vice versa. If stats don't resemble pics, I usually stay away. Not fool proof, but better than just relying on pics, which are usually outdated.
In defense of the man, he did rate your performance a 9!!! Now that ain't shabby at all. I know no one likes to have their appearance criticized (hell, I'm insecure as hell when it comes to that), but like it or not that's part of the price you ladies pay when you agree to let yourselves be reviewed.
Speaking only for myself, though, rather than be upset about your called out hippiness, I'd suggest you smile and enjoy the "9" rating...those just aren't real easy to cum by.
I usually want to see how tall a lady is - you can't always see that from the pictures. I've seen pictures I like and the lady was 4'11" - much too short for me.
I never, ever trust the weight given in a lady's ad. Also, I rarely ever trust cup size, either. Ladies always seem to add a cup size or two.
When I review a lady, I really try to be objective. I try to rate performance with no regards to appearance. If I would have known going in that she is as bottom heavy as she is I probably would not have made the appointment. The pictures, in my opinion, do not accurately show her size. But with that said, given here incredible performance, I would have seen her again (before today). Hell if she would call me now, I would probably have to rethink my new position....
Some of us are numerically literate, some are visually literate. I could, and may yet, write a treatise on close examinations of visual images.
For example, I look at a person's arms to see if the wrist bone is heavy or thin, the upper arm to see if the musculature is flabby, the texture of the skin of the forearm to estimate age.
Comparing statistics, such as height vs. weight and then looking at the picture to really figure out if a woman of 5'-2" with thick waist and heavy bone structure can reasonably by 115 # is a worthwhile exercise.
Stats won't tell you the true picture of a woman. I was amazed that there are shorter women than me who weigh less than me, but look larger than me. Pictures also add a little more weight than what you see in person. I can never be objective when viewing my pictures. They never depict all of my true beauty.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
