I read a review about a lady coming to our city.  They indicated CBJ and I thought to myself.. no way..

How many others think the same way.  I would rather not even get a BJ than to have a CBJ.

Anyone else want to chime in...

R2T

I always prefer the BBBJ but have had some really awesome CBJ's.  Depend if I am thinking with my big head or little head.
Little head usually wins.
It is not a deal breaker for me.
NJNYCLV

I wouldn't go into a situation where I thought a CBJ would be involved either, although it is certainly the ladies call to limit their services if they choose. However, there are lots of ladies that do BBBJ. The associated risk appears to be quite small for both parties.

So, yeah, advertised CBJ is a deal-breaker.

definitely prefer bbbj- so cbj not a deal breaker- but close- if provider super hot and performance is excellent other than cbj would still see- but have not seen a few that I would have seen but for cbj if that makes any sense

I had a decent one once from a porn star, but that defeated the purpose of being with a porn star.Most gals that do CBJ have OTHER rules too.

I don't know how the ladies can stomach the taste of latex, and lube? Jiz tastes better than that. lol

An absolute yes.  I literally fell asleep from the boredom of a CBJ once.

Yes it is a deal breaker for me except for one long time provider that I see. Back then most providers did not do bbbj let alone cim.

Yes, it's a deal-breaker for me, too. Like masturbating with an oven mitt.

Unanimous,BBBJ is the way to go. CBJ just doesn't make it for me. Hell, a good wet HJ beats that.

when the condom does not fit.


Sorry,  all I have left are small.

nuff said...

for me to consider CBJ. I definitely prefer BBBJ.


But it is not a deal breaker.

and you would know this how fuzzy   lol lol   only   kidding   , advertised cbj is a dealbreaker  but im glad atleast they do advertise it so not to waste everyones time that isnt into the cbj

CBJ has to be done well though.

I can't believe just how many profiles that I've seen here lately on both the Philly and DC boards that indicate CBJ.  And the punchline is:  rates of $300 + for this level of service.  I don't even consider it an option.  For 3-350 or more, not only do I expect BBBJ, but Greek has to be on the table as well. It has been difficult finding this combo especially since the departure of Becca some months ago. CBJ... why bother? As I told one provider here in DC recently, "if you have such an aversion to jizz, perhaps you should consider another line of work."

Yes, deal breaker.  As someone else said, I've had many HJs that beat CBJ by a long shot (both puns not intended).

I'd rather not bother with a BJ if it's covered, but deal breaker?  It all depends.  I am not fixated on any one activity.  It is possible, for example, that DATY with prostate massage and a good lubed HJ could do it for me if she was really into that. My current lovely obsession is really great sexually, but her BJ is only now getting good yet it has been months of sensational sex.

but I choose the cover.

if a provider is skilled and knows the proper technique to do CBJ it shouldn't make that much of a difference.
From time to time, I have had those who request a cover and have achieved excellent results. It's all in the talent

XO Ellyse Taylor

GRRRRRRR.

It up to the girl to set her rules, but no BBBJ then please do not GFE.  No one would keep a GF around that would only do CBJ.

There is no pleasure at all from CBJ.  Its a waste of time.

I only do BJ half of time.  I spent most of my session time in DFK if she allows, mutual touching and breast sucking with little time left for BJ. I only ask for CBJ or BBBJ to get me ready for FS if she is not hot enough to get me into FS.

i never do full service
and
i just don't like condoms at all

i know this eliminates a lot of women right up front, but that's just the way it is