Has anyone seen Camilla, she looks too good to be true.She is in Phila. untill the 26th of Feb. & has an ad on EROS.

Saw that today as well. She does look yummy!

I agree she is hot, but I worry about these ads with phone only, no website, no reviews, possible B&S.  TOFTT and let us know more.

will post a review later, however, you should know that while the photos are her, she is 'older' than the photos look.  Her body is as advertised.  She is very nice as a person, but really not a GFE.  When I called, I thought she was hispanic due to the accent.... but she is actually Sweedish?  go figure - Ole Bizzaro cannot tell the diff.

She is sweet, and a bit aloof - but that might be because she is kinda new to this area... and does not know her way around.  I suspect that she is very shy - all in all, not bad, and has a smokin body... and is willing to please but just not GFE.

Dude, are you Sure.  I've seen her pictures before on the internet.  This is Her here.

http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/nikol_w.html

and here is that set...

http://www.sportyone.com/servlets/firebolt?object=112532

Is this her who is providing?  I have my doubts cause she has never done HC on the net.

but just older.  her bod is still in good shape... but older.  As I left, I looked at her eyes... and that was pretty good evidence that it is her - hard to 'fake' the eyes.

What is HC?  Hard Core?  High Contrast?  lol!  

My turn off, was that it was not GFE... although I gotta say, she kinda got into the session... and that was ok.  She is also a nice person... with a personality - but that only came out at the end...   so, how sure am I?  about 95% sure.  I even asked if it was her, and she said yes... bwahahaha....

Pictures are definitely from that set, hard to fake the white tank top.  May not be pics of Camilla, but I understand that all Swedish girls look like that, though!  From that point of view, they are fungible.

None of you have seen her.  I have.  You've all offered the opinion that it is not her. ok, I get it.  

However, having seen her, it is her, older - the pictures are of her when she was younger.  the bod is the same, the eyes are the same.  and the bone structure of the face are the same.  Short of PCR DNA analysis, with 7-14 reference matches, finger printing and a retinal scan - it is her.  (I forgot to take my forensics kit with me.)

sheese.

What do you mean "Not quite GFE?" This is like being not quite pregnant, no?