I recently saw a provider based on several pages of good reviews, the pics, and other info on ter.  She was very nice, so I don't want to bong her, but the pics were fake, the descriptions were way, way off and among other things, she sure wasn't thin.  How is this possible?  Any ideas?

Beats me.

I'd be annoyed to....I'm just wondering why the several good reviews are so different from your experience. I would be finding that out, someone's not telling the truth/and or fake reviews. Maybe you should do a real review with your experience....is this not what TER is all about. Insightfull Information

just my 02cents

I was on the fence on this one notwithstanding all the reviews, and there were quite a few.  Then there was a kudos from a regular poster on the discussion board and I thought what the heck, why not take the plunge.  Man, was I wrong.  I really don't get it.  Generally, in the past, even just with a couple reviews they aren't totally off the mark, this one was, way, way off.  I get different tastes and stuff, but it wasn't even close.  I guess I am just venting, but talk about annoyed.  I'm sure I'm not the first one either on this one.  Very strange.

Since I have no idea who you are talking about, take my comments for what they are...conjecture.

Having read this and other boards over the years there are handful of girls who actively participate in the conversation on this board. For the most part, these are the more mature (as in years) and less attractive (not saying ugly) providers.  I don't know how many times a girl has posted new pics, I was like I would never see her and a stream of posts popped up saying how hot she is.  

These girls work the guys both online and in person.  Since they arent "hot" they market themselves directly to their customers as being friendly and fun, which is smart on their part.

This must create softer reviews due to the pre-date friendly relationships that have developed.

Also, yes I realize there are a few exceptions to my generalization including Macy, Tiffany and Becca.

provide us with some specifics and maybe we can offer you an answer.

Ihink your statement is way off base...looking at your track record speaks for itself.

Thank god there for the many gents with a better & open attitude.



-- Modified on 8/1/2008 9:04:48 AM

You said the pictures were fake.  Were they just old or just not her at all?

-- Modified on 8/1/2008 8:16:07 AM

Not her at all.  Not even close.  Not old pictures, totally someone else.  That's what kind of set me off on this message, which I have never done before.  I usually just read messages and reviews and no postings.  The pics were not even close, which was strange as there were several pages of reviews.  Also, the other descriptors were not even close, which again has not been my experience.  Generally, with a few reviews and the claim that the pics are accurate, that has been true.  Very strange this one and I'm kind of irritated.

I disagree.  It's not way off base.  We all know that this is a business and some are customers and some are sales people.  I want to know what I am purchasing or I will go elsewhere.  What's wrong with that?  I am entitled to spend my money how I see fit and the sales people are entitled to refuse sales as they see fit.  I respect the decision of sales people to refuse sales, why can't they respect my decision not to purchase the goods if I am not interested.  Don't lie about it.

What did I say that was so crazy?  I mean I know I usally post a showstopper....but I thought I answered the question intelligently.

Absurd77777 -

I had a very similar experience with a well known provider here earlier this year and think I know whom you are talking about.  I had a couple of off-line conversations about it with some prominant members on this Board and was told that "honesty is the best policy" and I should include it in the review.  In the end, I decided not to post a review at all in the interest of not making waves....I'm not proud of my decision but do not want to get involved in a lot of drama.

Seems most prefer steak-without

Thank you
2008=27