Enjoy, but remember, the numbers are only the begining.  The reviews give the numbers their meaning.

pretty self-explanatory...over 875 reads so far.

If you need further assistance, please let me know.

Reid you go to the link in the Post? It is...

Hey Macy, maybe we can get somebody to explain it to you.

For Macy: She's just posting something that other people might be interested in, wasn't asking for what you thought.

-- Modified on 4/4/2007 4:11:36 AM

So what? they have 300 reviews. I have only heard of 2 girls on the list. Most don't travel. And so what if they have 300 reviews, it only means that they have either been in the bizz for a while, therefore they're not 23 (shocked look) or they line em up like a bakery (nextttt). Sorry for my cynicism, but I could care less who has how many reviews.

Talk about hypocritical. And this is a message board. Its the business of the PUBLIC. You need help if you have this much anger towards someone on a message board!!!!

I mean it almost sounded like a compliment until you see for example, the comments next to BettySNJ...

Betty of South Jersey – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=13978
372 Reviews since May 2002 - the 5th most reviewed woman on TER
4.83 Average Days per Review, the 7th fastest pace in C300
7.08 Average Overall Rating the lowest in C300
8.30 Average Performance Rating 10th highest in C300
5.86 Average Looks Rating the lowest in C300

To explain the fact that she has the high performance rating is nice but to say she has the lowest ratings for appearance is just mean and unnecessary, not to mention the things you pointed out about as well. I should have been more concise in my comment but it was late and some boys here in Conshy wore me out yesterday!

-- Modified on 4/4/2007 6:26:47 AM

-- Modified on 4/4/2007 6:27:51 AM

Seriously, when I looked at the list, I've only been with one of them - Samantha - and I have to say that night was so incredible, and the experience so intense that it would be difficult for me to go back - I would be afraid that it would not live up to expectations....

so if these ladies are represented by the likes of Samantha, I must say that the quest should be to see them all!  yahoooooooooooooo!!!

So many great women, so little time.

do yourself a favor, go to Los Angeles and see Jenny.  That experience was beyond words or description.  She was simply incredible.

I have only seen three of the ladies on the list but had an above average meeting with one and phenomenal sessions with both Samantha and Jenny.

I am personally planning on trying to see all of the "Top Ten" in the next couple of years.  Kind of a tour of champions if you will.

Keeping an eye on the DC boards as I do, I'm not sure about the whole Rate-A-Date concept.  That being said however, I will put my $.02 for Jordan Kay.  Absolutely exquisite experience that I can't wait to repeat.

Post one for the Philadelphia area.

Post one what for the Philadelphia Area?

Club 300 is all of the ladies on TER world-wide with 300+ reviews it already includes everybody from everywhere.

that Rate-A-Date no longer rates ladies when posting their ads.

The "new and improved" R-A-D model is to show who the top performers are and how they compare to their peers.

This is in line with what the guys said they were looking for when the original R-A-D concept was being tested.

Thank you very much for your input, and I look forward to hearing your comments.

...inducted into the Provider Hall of Fame.  They are the Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Honus Wagner, Christy Mathewson & Walter Johnson of the Hobby.  LOL

I have met a few of these ladies and now you compare them to fat drunken ball players....EEEEWWWW!

I feel queasy...and possibly, oddly, a little aroused...nope, just more nauseous!

There has to be a joke in there somewhere.  For example, that's not fair to the ladies from previous era's.....before the internet....couldn't work in air conditioning like the providers of today, etc.  They also had to work harder then getting the older clients off before viagara... Oh well, never mind...

Makes for marginally interesting reading but unless the providers are actually accessible, the information is meaningless to me...IMHO, of course.  I'm familiar with a few of the providers but will this change the way I approach the hobby?  Probably not.  I do remember when RAD hit the DC boards.  There have been some changes but the concept is the same. If you want to see how sucessful it'll be, try charging for the service.  Everything of value has a price and I'm not certain if I would pay anything for it.  While I applaude your efforts, there just more information than I need or want.

it was meant as a service to let guys know about some of the legendary ladies of TER from around the US.  

A lot of people could care less about how many homers Barry Bonds has, but I have a feeling that a couple of news outlets may carry the story, just based on the numbers...just a thought.

Again, there was no intent other than information.  

A final note: with over 2640 reads, somebody is interested, sorry you aren't.

May you have a Great Day and if you have an appointment...A Great Lay!!!

they are appreciated.

This as simply posted to see if people had an interest in seeing information about the Legends of TER.  

These ladies represent a work ethic that is rare in this profession.  They work hard and consistently and they have achieved a level of success that I thought many would find interesting.

I have been lucky enough to see several of these women in my travels and I had no idea that they were some of the top reviewed women on all of TER, they just had good consistent reviews and seemed like nice people.

If you find the information usefull, I am glad.  If not, I am sorry to have taken your time.

Have A Great Day and if you have an appointment...A Great Lay.

but when you rank people by numbers, somebody is going to have the lowest number and somebody is going to have the highest number, that is just the way it is.

I used numbers and information straight from TER and presented it without prejudice, I apologize if that offended you.  There was a highest and lowest for each rating, that is the nature of statistics.

I am curious what you meant by "not to mention the things you pointed out about as well."  to what are you referring?  I am curious.

Thank you for your comments I really appreciate them.  

Have a Great Day

I do have 5/6 ratings in appearance but that is not the most important factor for the guys who choose to book with me...they are interested in my  oral abilities and what I can do with my mouth.

Sincerely, I prefer not to have the looks...I don't get guys who wants to bang the heck out of me all day, because they want the hotties for these kind of sessions.

I only have to use my mouth, my body doesn't get the wear & tear and I am not mentally jaded either.

This list is very interesting because I am the 5th most reviewed provider in the country and, ironically, 95% of the time I don't have to have sex or shed one single piece of clothing during my appointments.

Thanks Rate-A-Date, I appreciate your effort!

xoxoxo

Betty








-- Modified on 4/4/2007 1:55:40 PM

I was responding to the comments that Legman4love pointed out about girls with that many reviews generally have been in the business a long time and are older (which is fine) or that if they are not, they probably approach things like an assembly line (not many guys like feeling like the 12th appointment of the day!)That leads into why I posted a response. BettySNJ is a sweetheart with stellar performance ratings. Although her looks aren't everyone's ideal, who cares? She has a heart of gold and I just felt that somebody should put a word in on her behalf. I get my fair share of bashing on the boards too and I know how petty some people can be. Lately there has been so much negativity on this board. I understand your intention was to point out statistics but statistics in this case are based on over 300 very intimate encounters and might really hurt someone's feelings when the negatives are being pointed out. If someone wants to see her they'll look at her pics and make their own judgement, yes. I do see the value of reviews though and I admire your originality in the post. Macy

I already knew that would be your response,lol. We know so many of the same people and I've never heard anyone say a bad word about you sweety!

you are truly a legend in the TER community and I have heard nothing but GREAT things about you.

Like I stated before, this was simply presented as the legedary ladies of TER kind of recognition, not an analysis of skills or worth or anything like that.

In fact if you looked at the post the first line in the post stated "Remember, numbers are just a begining - Reviews give life to the facts."  That is more true in some cases than others, but still very valid.


In fact, if you go around the coutry and look on local boards, your videos on your site have gotten rave reviews, so much so that you may want to consider a tour!

I truly appreciate your response and thank you for taking the time to weigh in with your thoughts on this.  

I am truly thankful.

Have a Great Day!

That is something that we can agree upon.  Once again, I applaude your efforts.  No negatives here, just my opinion.  I deal with numbers everyday.  We're driven by numbers and reports.  I tell my folks that numbers talk and BS walks.  In the hobby, so much can hinge on personal chemistry.  I've also found that the true value and performance of a provider can only be determined by more than one visit.  We all have good days and bad days.  Catch a provider on a bad day and perception of her performance could be a disaster.  The converse is also true.  Again, just the thoughts of one hobbyist.

You running for office ? lol

beyond words, what I did not say was that my all time best sessions were with two who are not on the list - at all.  and one of those made a lasting impression on me, and if I lived in the same city, well, I would go broke.  yea, just like that!  You sir, are correct, Chemistry can trasform a session into something totally different.

You posted a list for the DC area.

Philadelphia area has NOTHING to be ashamed of.  I too have visited Betty's site... wondering what it would be like...... ummmm!


There are those  who have rated higher in looks than Betty, but when in person I met them, well, they were not quite as good as their score would indicate.  On the other hand I've met some whose score was far below what I would rate them as...  it is a "taste" or perception as to the beauty of another... clearly Betty knocks the socks off most who see her!  Congrats Bettty!

-- Modified on 4/4/2007 6:28:57 PM

Chemistry and the golden rule...timeless and so appropriate.  Guys treat providers like the ladies they are and the results can be amazing.  I think that we are getting there, men!

Would there be some pussy in it for me? lol! If it's good enough for Bill and Hillary, it's good enough for me!  nah...too much trouble!

We need another rating system.  We have looks and performance, but we need one for emotional stability.  What do you think, Macy?

Link Below.

As another provider, who are you to criticize Betty? Are you Hillary?  Are you the Czarina of TER?  You should be happy that there's no grades for mental stability.  You are all the proof I need that there needs to be a guys-only board.  You know, one where the guys can say what they want without a hall monitor blowing up.

Yes, you should post a Top 10 list for all the cities, I.E philly, Boston, NY, Chicago, etc.

I was not criticizing her at all. What my post stated was that by pointing out in the ORIGINAL post something negative about her looks was mean and unnecessary. If you want to constantly harp on everything I say, try actually reading it first.