Found this link on the Jersey boards, kind of makes her reviews a bit suspect.

We all know how important reviews can be, especially good ones.  That's how the ladies build their business and reputation.  So I assume this particular lady is looking to increase her business by offering a little extra in exchange for a review.  As long as the reviews are honest I see no reason to question her motive.

Nothing wrong with her asking for a review. However I am sure it is this phrase that he has issue with(for the record so do I)  
"And of course the ratings must be very high! "

Now this is a problem  especially if she is not FS. By TER guidelines if she is not FS the highest review she should be able to get should be an 8.  In an attempt to get their 30minutes free I am sure there will be gentleman  that will give 9's and 10s.  

That my friend is a problem since as you know many hobbyist simply look at the review numbers . If they see nothing but 9's and 10's they figure it is an excellent time where in this situation I am sure there will be some serious upgrading in order to qualify for the freebie.

According to her reviews she is FS...http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=113917

I've never met her but I don't see the issue as long as the reviews are honest, and I agree that for an extra 1/2 some guys may write a bull shit review.

I guess we'll see how this pans out!

If someone didn't greatly enjoy his time with her , why would he want an extra half hour added to the next visit? why would there be a next visit?  

If you didn't enjoy a $400 dinner at a "nice" restaurant, would the promise of even more mediocre food on your next visit make you to say nice things about the meal?  

The hobbyist who started this thread didn't pass my screening, so of course he's going to try to make me look bad.  Maybe you should just ask for more specifics on the policy before starting a nasty thread on the Philly forum.  From the way you write about me, I am REALLY glad I decided not to meet you.  

Notice I said that you get an extra 30 minutes (not a freebie) the next time we meet, AFTER the review has been posted.  So that means the client who writes it has already made a finacial investment in meeting me, so he's not really getting anything for free.  I am just extending a courtesy beause he took the time to chronicle our experience together, somehting he didn't have to do.  

All of my reviews are good, and most of them were posted BEFORE I put that notice on my web site, so there is nothing suspect about them.  Checking the facts before you attack is a better policy.

Why all the venom Alex.... The guy made some valid points about your offer and you flame him!!  So what if he didn't pass your screening!!! There are many reasons that someone wouldn't pass a screening, maybe he didn't want to give up all of his personal information.

more importantly....How does she know who the guy is? He posted using an alias. I am sure Alex is fine young lady but her giving free time with additional stipulation on the reviews being"very high" IMHO is questionable.

-- Modified on 5/29/2008 4:46:50 AM

Actually, Alex, I think there's a problem with terminology.  When you say 'excellent review' and 'mediocre review' you are suggesting that you will reward a person for giving you high ratings.  If that's the case, there's a bias or lack of objectivity introduced and that's a problem as it's not in the spirit of the concept of hobbyist reviews.

If however you mean 'free time for writing *a* review', with 'excellent' meaning that the person wrote a fair, balanced, and accurate opinion of the meeting-  that's different.  

The text you used in your diary suggests that you will reward those who offer you praise, and that can introduce some degree of inaccuracy in the review.  I suggest you change your text or accept the criticism (or both).