A new reviewer and a new provider posted today.  The website is already bad and the review is a 10/10.  She must have done everything several times...

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=99919

...from below thread:

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=28321&boardID=28&page=1

Dang...a simple quick click reveals that Sonic boom has been reviewing for almost a year and has 7 reviews...http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/searchbyreviewerResults.asp?MemberID=553500&Membername=sonicboom73

Callie has at least 3 diffrent threads in the last 2 months......


-- Modified on 7/26/2007 6:49:48 AM

I had been (in retrospect) foolish enough to post a comment on a thread which suggested that her prior set of pics was misleading/inaccurate.  As I noted, her current pics are absolutely accurate and she is a wonderful person.  I should have kept my mouth shut and gone about my business.  In any case, I'm happy/grateful to know her.

Well they both are listed as "new" by TER.  But it doesn't matter.  TER yanked the link from the provider page and now it's mute point.

Even so, there is almost nothing worth a 10/10.  She had better be a model and provide NQNS along with multiple cups, dildo demos, and natural "C" cup tits.  Anything less is, well, less.  I automatically reduce these reviews to an 8/8.  However, you can continue to inflate yours.

Like "your" and "you're", "mute" is interchangeable with "moot".  LOL.  Nonetheless, his meaning was clear.