Newbie - FAQ

you of course my luv
macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 985 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

Seasoned Hobbist....Feel free to critique type guys assessment of the "well reviewed" "established" Provider...Thx
"Well Reviewed" and "Established"  is a matter of perspective....wann see if you newbs are headed in the right direction.
Thanks Guys!!

no takers..so ill go..a well established provider has been at it for awhile and usually has a full stable of regulars at her disposal..a well reviewed provider usually gets 9,s and 10,s on her reviews..a well established provider sometimes doesnt have great reviews but if she has a following it really does not matter..i saw a provider last week who gets all 10,s..she earned them but is new to the business and is trying to establish herself..the ultimate provider is the one who has both..she never has to worry about where her next client is coming from because she has earned her status through performance and reputation..

pj19641179 reads

Ex. Paris Bouvier. Just add a dot com and you can check out her site. She also has many excellent reviews. In Orlando. Well established AND well reviewed provider. She has 150ish reviews, and they average 9/9.

I spoke of her vaguely a few weeks ago. Damn nice and elegant.

Posted By: macdaddy1944
no takers..so ill go..a well established provider has been at it for awhile and usually has a full stable of regulars at her disposal..a well reviewed provider usually gets 9,s and 10,s on her reviews..a well established provider sometimes doesnt have great reviews but if she has a following it really does not matter..i saw a provider last week who gets all 10,s..she earned them but is new to the business and is trying to establish herself..the ultimate provider is the one who has both..she never has to worry about where her next client is coming from because she has earned her status through performance and reputation..
-- Modified on 3/16/2012 10:25:51 PM

yourself ;)  Just kidding of course! With three pages of mostly 9/9s, I think you are well beyond the "well reviewed" "established" stage!

I know everyone will have different opinions of this, but my opinion, which I have used in some of my posts to newbies, is that to be considered well reviewed, a lady should have a minimum of 6 reviews, with ratings of 7 or higher, and a minimum of 3 of those should be written by hobbyists who have written more than three reviews. How's that for objective? :)

Now that is my recommendation for newbies. It doesn't mean I follow it myself all the time. For example I wouldn't have a problem seeing a lady who only has two reviews, if they are 9s or better and both written by reviewers with lots of reviews. I will also see an unreviewed lady on recommendations from a trusted hobbyist or provider. I am also not opposed to TOFTT, if a whole lot of other things seem right. For example, she may not have reviews, but diligent research didn't turn up any red flags, and I really like her look and her rates. I would never recommend toftt for newbies, or even the referral/recommendation thing, because they are newbies, they don't know any provider or hobbyist well enough to take recommendations.

That's my .02
It will be interesting to see other peoples' ideas.

Posted By: perfectstorm
yourself ;)  Just kidding of course! With three pages of mostly 9/9s, I think you are well beyond the "well reviewed" "established" stage!

I know everyone will have different opinions of this, but my opinion, which I have used in some of my posts to newbies, is that to be considered well reviewed, a lady should have a minimum of 6 reviews, with ratings of 7 or higher, and a minimum of 3 of those should be written by hobbyists who have written more than three reviews. How's that for objective? :)

Now that is my recommendation for newbies. It doesn't mean I follow it myself all the time. For example I wouldn't have a problem seeing a lady who only has two reviews, if they are 9s or better and both written by reviewers with lots of reviews. I will also see an unreviewed lady on recommendations from a trusted hobbyist or provider. I am also not opposed to TOFTT, if a whole lot of other things seem right. For example, she may not have reviews, but diligent research didn't turn up any red flags, and I really like her look and her rates. I would never recommend toftt for newbies, or even the referral/recommendation thing, because they are newbies, they don't know any provider or hobbyist well enough to take recommendations.

That's my .02
It will be interesting to see other peoples' ideas.

I agree with perfectstorm on this. I want to see 6 or so reviews and 3 or 4 of them by guys with many
reviews. I'd go with fewer guys with many reviews if I knew them to be guys that liked what I like based on their past reviews. I'm looking for ratings of 7 or higher.

I have no problem seeing a provider without reviews if she is recommended by guys I trust as reviewers. There are some I communicate with by PM that if they say go see her I know it will be a good experience.
Like perfectstorm I don't recommend this for newbies.

As somebody who will jumping off the high board for the first time next week while I am on a business trip I was looking somebody with 20+ reviews over a period of a couple of years.  I actually have two appointments scheduled although with one I took more reviews over about a 1 year period, with some of her reviews posted by very well known TER posters.  So I can't say there is a strict formula but those are the guidelines I am using.  In both cases the bulk of their reviews are in the 8+ range, fit what experiences I hope to have and are hotter than... (insert imagination here ;) )

Hope this helps.

I dont want a random escorts number that has no web site or reviews or ads even. I d wqnt to be able to see they are really a real provider not le, workin with the guy some how I guess

Hell I even toftt, but back to the question, if an escort has 3 to 6 reviews all by veteran hobbyist I would say a newb hobbyist would be ok.

but most important is a couple by experienced reviewers.  I might even lower the number if there were the experienced reviewers.  If no experienced reviewers, I'd go to the high side 10-12...  looking at collective averages.   First reviews (of her) are suspect unless verified by later reviewers...  without going into details, it is possible to game the system on first reviews.
To Newbies (we all were once)  When you get to shopping, you need VIP to read the full reviews.  In too many cases, the initial review claims menu items not offered to later clients.  Say BBBJ or CIM but later reviews show CBJ.   You need to know the menu before you get to her door.  GFE is an ad term now & is not a menu.  

Just because her AD says well reviewed on TER, does not mean the reviews are good!  We've all seen ads where the reviews were BAD but she even linked to them...  I guess figuring most guys are not members or not VIP & too lazy or stupid to check.  PROVE them WRONG!!

I also read the reviews with reguard to her photos.  The Profile says "REAL Photo" and  "Photo Accurate"...  as profile items these are likely set by the first reviewer.  I read the details to see what other reviewers said about her pictures.  ALSO, I follow the links to see if she has good pictures.   Photos need not be explicit but there should be more than the same 1 or 2 over & over.  (Makes me suspect they are old...  as I've found this on occasional)   I want to see a variety of pictures, good resolution & open big enough to be seen clearly.  Taken in total, I want to know what she looks like naked.   I can judge for myself as part of my research, if the photos are there.   I will pass on inadequate pictures.  
H

with reasonably consistent scores.

A good way to tell if a Provider is well established is a website. A good one. Now with TER it is easer. If a lady has good reviews that were posted 4-5 years ago, and is still getting them today... That is well established in my mind.
Well reviewed... I don't think a lady has to have a huge amount of reviews to be well reviewed. I mean if she has 4 reviews from guys that have posted 20+ reviews, and they are good. That is well reviewed in my mind.

I agree with the half dozen or more minimum number of reviews.  I disagree with one comment about the reviewers.  IMHO, three reviews does not make a reviewer 'well-established'.  My thinking on this is he should have at least as many reviews as the provider does, like 6, or maybe even as many as 10.  Ten reviews makes a reviewer eligible for the reviewers only board.

I like the comment about the ads that say 'well-reviewed'.  This topic was discussed here just recently.  Just because the ad makes that claim is no guarantee that it's true.  More often than not, an ad will make that claim, but provide no link to them.  Or, when you go to the reviews, they are often horrible.  She is banking on the guy taking her word for it and being too lazy to look them up.

Swim

I meant to say "5." I missed it in proofreading. (Minimum of 6 reviews, minimum of 3 of those from guys with more than 5 reviews)

BTW, looks like when you sign in under classic, your name isn't red. Kind of weird:)

Register Now!