Right now that line is around about MPs, and beyond that, nada.

It would be nice if there was a board for things like webcam models, and who knows, maybe there is.  Use Google and see what comes up under that search

But there isnt.....not legit reviews from members.
justmodels reviewing themselves.. the equivalent of providers posting reviews for themselves.  
Plus im thinking this would be the new thing like pse/ gfe but cs

you do not provide any of the services required for a review.  All you do is let guys watch you on camera, there is no physical interaction between you and the client.  To post a review on TER, there has to be an actual physical meeting between the provider and the client.

Perhaps in the future there will will be a category for webcam girls, just not right now.  You should contact admin to inquire about allowing webcam-girl reviews.

LLAP,
Swim

See that is the thing, i am a provider!
 and i previously had a page of reviews ...
..returning to the life and honestly never left.
I took alittle time to get ME together and focus on webcam buisness
But that is what i was trying to do, is.. spark interest of admin and  
see what others have to say about it. ( i cant be the only virtual companion,..can i? )
And do you think ill be welcomed back seeing as ive been gone for 9 years?? ) is that normal?
Im loving all the discussions on the board! Im learning allot, and i have allot of catching up to do!

-- Modified on 1/25/2016 8:54:13 PM

It seems that the TER template and expertise is the kind of thing you want but TER has its own identity and brand to protect and cam-only would change (weaken) that brand. Maybe TER would work with you to spin-off and cam-review site? Or help you to start such a site.  

Help with some examples ... I'm blanking here ... Big companies used to have their Name Brand and their own knock-off brand:
Sony and ???
GE and ???
Duracell and their other brand

Escort Reviews and Cam Review

That would be.....valuable!
In this case, im saying, the cam star would be reviwed as an escort.  
Ehhh its sticky because then you would have to ask what type of service does she provide?!....lol does she bring her webcam?? ) or you would have to have seen her cam show?  

Even then she probably would still be classified as pse :/

 i am classified as.... some ninja mutant gfe/pse cross breed....  
So thats what it takes to be a great cam girl!
Big idea SHOT DOWN by me )
♥ TinaMariexx

I'm not cam-viewer, but it seems to me that the review criteria that the two groups would want to know about are all different. The current TER review fields don't match up with review items cam viewers want to know about.  

EVERY cam girl would be sex/no bj/no kiss/no no no no no no ... and that would totally dilute the already weak search capability of TER. Some guys DO just want to find FBSM ... Oh ... they would search massage/YES while cam girls are massage/no.  

Let me try a different Duracell analogy. They make high performance lithium, NiCad, silver oxide, alkaline and other batteries. And they still make low performance zinc-carbon batteries with specs so much different that you wouldn't consider them in the same review.  

I don't know exactly what cam viewers want to know about, but it sure isn't swallow/yes-or-no. I think realistic review fields would be totally out of sync with the current format.  

Why don't you come up with some field suggestions for a new database?

Camera quality: HD, hi-res, low-res, kinescope, smudged lens
Lighting: high-qual, low-qual, you need sonar or infrared to find her in the darkness
Shadow control: deliberately blocks, no shadows, ...
Camera features: fixed distance, fixed focus, variable distance zoom, etc.
Distance only or tight close-ups
Shows face? Y/N
Toys?  
Audio? Is there audio in cam shows?  
Text/chat? (How do you type with your hands busy doing other stuff?)
Can guys record live streams? (Is there a way to block recording of live streams?)  

FULL, NO RUSH SESSION: an existing TER field. How much time does she waste before getting to the good stuff?
TWO GIRL ACTION: an existing TER field.

-- Modified on 1/26/2016 12:52:57 PM

Yes!!!! You see the vision.
ill be moving forward with this WILD idea...
Thanks impposter 😍

encounter between a provider and a client.  Yes, TM, you do have some old reviews as a provider, but any current reviews must be of you as a provider of face-to-face contact, actual physical contact, not just watching you on a vid-cam.  If you want new reviews, you will have to be a TER-defined provider, not just a cam girl.

If you want TER to allow reviews of cam girls, you will have to convince them, good luck.

LLAP,
Swim

Just the best 📢
Ha! The thing is im still a provider.  
It would be a cool spin off....."cam girl review"!  
i want to be a part of it.
 Cammers in the cam lifestyle would be able to share just like here.... but i completley understand noone wants to mix the two!
TER would only have to add cse in the future so when clients write a review they can choose cse for me 😀
♥ TinaMariexxx

Reviewing your service would be like reviewing cooking shows on a site designed to review restaurants. Related, yes. The same, absolutely not.

I don't mean to rain on your parade, but I would have no more interest in having cam girls reviewed here than I would be interested in reviews of porn. Sorry.

Have you seen Pse? ...look
We all agree another site would have to be made to review cam quailty and preformance ON CAM.
but in the physical realm.... lets just say for shits n giggles,  
you see an amazing CAM STAR  (thats me) who blew your mind
 shouldn't  "cse" possibly be an option on reviews in the future....
♥ TinaMariexxx

I have ZERO interest in this whatsoever