I'm new to writing reviews on ter , not new to the hobby , as i have seen ladies for over 25 years , I have started to write reviews and trying to understand the rating system , an i have followed the guidelines offered by the ter folks listed below .
However i see ladies getting 8/9 scores with cbj / lfk /no anal skills according to the scoring this makes no sense .and the correction is not done internally
In addition i see 10 ratings without anal being offered .
i think think this type of scoring hurts the providers  who offer these premium services  .
And makes the system seemed grossly flawed
i have a linked a review that reflects this flawed system {first reviewer }

In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system:
An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7,
Unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session:
Kisses with Tongue,
Bare-Back Blow Job
, Really Bi,
And Anal Sex.
For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum.

This does not mean she earns extra points for offering the service(s); just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is performed during your session with her. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she offers, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score

the General and Policy Boards. Most everyone agrees that it's a flawed system that is inconsistently applied. Most of the disagreement is over whether it's possible for any numerical rating to be much better.

BTW, anal is not required for a 10 score if the other three qualifying services are offered. Your example appears to be only one point off (9 instead of a maximum 8 for 'Really Bi'). However, it may be that, e.g., anal was offered but omitted from the review. I've seen apparent 3 point disparities (10s, w/o any of the four services offered).

If this really bothers you, I'd suggest searching the other boards for what's already been posted about it.

-- Modified on 7/3/2011 3:46:47 PM

And any numeric scale is likely to be so.  Tread all numbers 6-10 as essentially the same and read the words!

I do not particularly look for Bi or anal--it is not what I am interested in.  But I see some ladies who are very bi- and who do offer anal.  Since most the ladies I see do DFK and provide BBBJ, that makes them all eligable for a "10" (though I do not give many 10s).  Therefore if in my opinion I receive a truly excelent evening I have no problem giving a 9 or 10 even though my review may never mention a second lady or anal.

Read the words and decide if the lady meets your needs.  Anyone who goes by the numbers as the only (or even major) screening criteria for who they want to see is bound to be disapointed.

If it was MY scoring system points above a "7" might require:  DFK, BBBJ, being a good dinner companion, and laughing at my jokes.  Clearly not what matters to me.  But a numbering system that equates DFK (something I value a lot) with anal (something I do not care about) is inherently not very valuable to me.  And mine would not be valuable to many others.

The bigger problem in my mind is the issue of a lady's profile being determined by the first guy to see her.  Things change in looks, what she offers, etc.  If the first review was CBJ and no DATY (maybe because HE was not interested), then that is the way she is categorized forever.  Then searches give bad returns, etc.