I am new to this site but not new to the hoppy or posting on other sites.  I posted 2 reviews that have been rejected because they did not contain enough description inspite of the fact that I discribed the method of contacting the proveder, the looks and personality of the priovider, the accomidations where we met and an over assesment of the meeting.  What am I missing?? Help

On this site, they want the activities that took place to be described more thoroughly.  An "overall assessment of the meeting" is probably not giving the amount of details needed for the review to be approved.  I don't think it has to be a totally graphic x-rated move for move account of the action, though some reviews are and the one I'm currently writing pretty much is, but it needs to be descriptive on what took place.

In other words, you have to weigh the importance of getting a review published against any sense of decorum or what it is proper.

Yep. That’s it.

Think of it as a story,tell us how you fucked that pussy.Do something you have only thought of doing with in the ladys boundries than you can write about it,even include things that may seem insignifigant that only you notice. My trouble is remebering what hapens and in what order but thats when you know you had a great time.

If the OP (or any of us) actually had "any sense of decorum of what...is proper" he probably wouldn't be hobbying or on TER to begin with !  LOL!