You read and understand the policy correctly it seems. You are correct on your understanding of the tow acronyms also. She is eligible for a 7 unless she offers the extras. If she offers BBBJ and DFK as you said, then she is eligible for a 9. Not sure why the review was rejected, but a couple things come to mind. Perhaps none of her previous reviews mentioned those services and it is not in her profile. If it is something that just changed in her services or if she only offered it to you, and you are not an established reviewer, they may not take your word for it. Or maybe you did not write the review as clearly as you thought. You said you used the acronyms, but maybe something about the way you worded it, they did not understand? Without seeing your review it would be hard to guess, but in your general description in your op, it does sound like she should be able to get a 9. I think you should write back to them and explain that you did get those services, and ask what do you need to do to the review to get it approved. It may take a few back and forths with them, but eventually it should go through.
I wrote a review of a provider and used the acronyms BBBJ and DFK- which she provided- but TER denied it for this reason:
"In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she also willing to performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise the score she is eligible for by one point. This does not mean she earns extra points for performing the service; just that she is now eligible for a higher score. Her maximum eligible score is based on what is offered, not what is taken. You may or may not be interested in the “extra” services she has, but the fact she offers them makes her eligible for the higher score. As she doesn't offers none of those extra services,she is eligible for a maximum Performance score of 7, but you gave her 9."
I thought BBBJ stood for bareback blowjob, and DFK for deep french kissing. I don't get it.
You read and understand the policy correctly it seems. You are correct on your understanding of the tow acronyms also. She is eligible for a 7 unless she offers the extras. If she offers BBBJ and DFK as you said, then she is eligible for a 9. Not sure why the review was rejected, but a couple things come to mind. Perhaps none of her previous reviews mentioned those services and it is not in her profile. If it is something that just changed in her services or if she only offered it to you, and you are not an established reviewer, they may not take your word for it. Or maybe you did not write the review as clearly as you thought. You said you used the acronyms, but maybe something about the way you worded it, they did not understand? Without seeing your review it would be hard to guess, but in your general description in your op, it does sound like she should be able to get a 9. I think you should write back to them and explain that you did get those services, and ask what do you need to do to the review to get it approved. It may take a few back and forths with them, but eventually it should go through.
I don't know why I keep getting my appointments cancelled when I show up with him!
I think it's soooooooo dumb you can get an extra point for something that isn't a part of the session. I could lie and say I'm really bi and be eligible for the extra point for every session I've had even though there is no other girl in the room!
I think you should only be able to get the extra points if it was a part of the session you are reviewing.
A lot of guys don't even understand that that is what "10" means.... she has that she does anal or is truly bi on her profile even if neither came in to play during the session.
I wonder how many providers "turned bi" when they found out about that! Or just "anal, yes" but then it's like $2,000 extra so she never has to do it! Hey, that's not a bad idea....
Agree, you are correct in your understanding of the acronyms and point rules. Without being able to read your review and/or see the provider's profile, it's very difficult to determine why your review was rejected. I suggest same as PS did, rewrite it and resubmit it.
Thanks very much for the responses. I contacted TER support, turns out it was just a mistake and the review has now been approved. I appreciate everyone's help.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
