They like either the reviewer or the reviewed to have some review history to allow the review to post, if I remember correctly. This helps (but doesn't stop) a new provider from writing reviews of herself, and other shenanigans.

This means they want you to see, and write a review of, a lady with several reviews already. Once you get a review or two like this, then resubmit this review.

I find that difficult to believe.

Any provider’s first review has to be viewed with healthy skepticism, especially when it was written by someone who is submitting their first review. Unscrupulous providers will either write their first review themselves or have a friend do it for them. Those cases would look exactly like your case to TER. If someone who has established some credibility writes a review of the same provider you did, resubmit yours and they’ll probably approve it, as long as the review is reasonably consistent.

I know it sucks from your standpoint, but we all went through it. If you saw and reviewed a provider with a review history, it wouldn’t draw the same level of skepticism.

Wy does it seem unrealistic that I would see a provider yesterday and right the review the same day? is there some golden rule on a waiting period I didnt get a memo about? and The reason that I am confused about this is because I reviewed a well reviewed provider that has around 15 reviews. I get what your saying that if I was reviewing a provider with no reviews, they may question my review. But this is not the case, I meet with a provider that is well reviewed hense the question. Wy did my review not get approved for the reason stated? And if I need reviews to post reviews that doesnt really work right!

If you review a previously reviewed lady, then it is likely your review would be accepted...  It's New Reviewer & New Provider that is subject to this problem.   Then you can resubmit the rejected review...  you have 90 days from the meeting.  

skb