Silly question.  Posted a review, and it was rejected for "not enough explicit details"; I've got over a dozen done and done reviews, and no rejections.  So, do I just go and edit it, adding in more juicy details, or is there a more complicated procedure?

I had a review way, way back, where I chose to go a different way than the listing of acronyms.  Instead I tried to explain the mood of things.  My review was rejected for the reason that you mentioned.  I struggled with how to fix it, and finally decided to add..."so I f***ed her in the ass", and poof, it was approved.

on who looks at your review.  Yes, you will need to change something to get it approved.  At least they told you what was "wrong."  I had a review once that was rejected for "other".  After several PM's to staff the problem was resolved.

Not silly at all, can be aggrevating. Just add a sentence or two in there and resubmit. Probably a diffferent person looks at it the second time anyway. However, I did have one like yours way back and I kept questioning why it was not enough. Finally I was told that if they had of approved it the way I had it the first time without enough details and acronyms, they would have knocked the performance score down.

but don't explicitly mention the services that merit that score.  I've found that to be a problem on occassion with "PV/FBSM" providers who will do more once they know you, but don't want it mentioned in any reviews.  You know they merit a higher score and, frankly I feel bad only giving them a 7 when they really merit a 8,9 or 10; but that's the criteria.  If you don't want to explicitly describe the acts that merit higher, then you are stuck giving the 7.

But, knowing this, if there is someone with only 7 scores, but the review is very positive...often read between the lines and/or pm other reviewers and you may learn that more is really available.

Check some of the other reviews and just use your own words, to say how things went adding a few things that really made it for you or not.

Sometimes there is some inconsistency to the review process. Contrary to popular belief, Moderators have ZERO to do with the review process. I have been frustrated myself on a few occasions back when I was permitted to write reviews. BTW, the guys that do review approvals also handle the review "problem reports".  Hope this helps, and clears up a few things.

Resubmitted with some extra details- fingers crossed!

The exact reason I was leary of joining TER