That makes a lot of sense.
What do you think about women who post on boards in the escort section and the body rub section. So not a massage parlor. More like a hotel room where she performs a massage / rub. In that situation, is it less risky to ask to meet for a rub? Since you don't have to ask for service... and then allow her to make the leap? I guess one risk is that you only get a rub... if you get naked and lie on the table is that sgains the law? Again, I haven't asked her for anything at that point.
Posted By: impposter
In some locations (NY State; others please?), therapeutic massage can only be performed by someone who is licensed by the state to perform massage.
Those who are unlicensed and foolishly advertise "Massage" or similar are easy marks for LE to bust.
A sexual services sting can be more difficult, require more evidence, proof that money changed hands, more work and so on.
To get around the "massage" issue, many places will advertise "body rub" or similar. If you are in a "massage" parlor and LE walks in to bust the unlicensed massager, you might be in an embarrassing position. You might just be a witness, fully dressed, nothing sexual happening, name taken to testify for the prosecution. Of course, you might be in a more compromising position but it's unlikely that it's worth their effort to collect a DNA sample and haul you in, too.
"Body rub" places won't attract the EASY "illegal massage parlor" busts but will be a potential target for any other sting.
In NY State, if you want to see someone for "therapeutic massage" plus extras, make sure that they are licensed, if required by law. If you want to see someone for "massage with a happy ending" look for a place that doesn't ADVERTISE "massage" per se but might advertise "body rub" or other euphemism.