Newbie - FAQ

Here's what really bothers me.sad_smile
swimtrekr 58 Reviews 1298 reads
posted

The first reviewer sets the profile.  If she didn't do anything, how does he know what she provides?  That just makes no sense!!!!!  So who put all the services up there that she didn't do with the first reviewer?????

Something is def not right with this one.

Swim

I wanted to contact a provider I saw on EROS named Connie, a nice looking 40 something provider,but could not find any reviews so I held off thinking it was either a bait and switch or worse.  Trying to learn from others mistakes by not contacting a provider without reviews.  Now I see she has two reviews and they are highly conflicting.  Does anyone have any insight to this?

The first review could be a self review, or a friend, or a pimp, or an agency....The second one could be legit. (or the other way around) Or, they both could be legit but it is a totally YMMV situation. Or they both could be legit and one guy is an easy grader, and one is a harsh grader.

Any of those three scenarios are not a good situation for a newbie to jump in and be the third reviewer. Look for ladies with 6 or more consistant, good reviews. At least half of them written by reviewers with several to many reviews themselves.

You're on the "Newbie board". Chances are you're a "newb". Newbies should take the roads more traveled until they've acrued some street savvy. PERIOD!

Especially if they are all she has.  You would probably see very few veterans jumping on this one.  Did you check the reviewers' review history?  Doesn't sound like it.  That would give you some additional info on whether or not they were established reviewers.  Obviously, she is  not a well-reviewed provider with only 2 reviews.  The minimum you should be looking at is between 6 & 10.  The reviewers should have at least as many, preferably 10 or more so they are eligible for the reviewers only board.

Bottom line is, move on, IMHO.  There are plenty of providers out there with much better track records than this one.

Swim

Saw this in DC reviews today. Heres what I think, the first review was written by someone
who has no review history, (this being the only review). Now heres the ,thing he really seemed
sincere but has no credibility. He obviously was pretty frustrated and gave her a poor review.
  Now the second reviewer has a few reviews but has only been doing this for a year and seems
legit, based on his previous reviews. Still he has no track record and he gave her his highest marks of any lady he reviewed so far.
   I think the verdict is still out but my gut says ,stay away.. There are plenty of ladies that have
a great track record that would be a better bet.




I would still totally recommend a newbie against trying this one out.

But I did find the reveiws interesting. The first one sounds like she may have thugth the guy was LE, or something, or she was just waiting for him to make a move and he didn't. I imagine he's new and she is new. Newbie with a newbie, is not a good combination. If the second review has truth to it, She could be really good, and it should show as she gets further revews. I have seen some top, highly reviewed ladies, who had one or two really low scores when they were just starting out. anyway sounds like a challenge for some seasoned TOFTT type guys, but definitly not newbie territory:)

Every review he has , has been exactly as other reviewers,I don't get how you say thats his high mark did you look @ his reviews?Look I dont know why the newbie poster got mad, but even if you only view his profile..multi-pops?dfk,bbbj and no rush session? WTF and he gives a 2 on performance.Bigger question is how ter let him get away with that low a score.

except to see that he had more than one. So I don't know his style. So yes he could be totally wrong too. That is why I said if his review is true, then it will come out when she gets more reviews. For that matter, if his review is false, it will come out in her future reviews too. The point is still that this is not a good choice for a newbie, and until a few more guys TOFTT, the verdict is out.

As for the profile, there is s asimple explanation (or a few explanations actually). Obviously the second reviewer set the profile. Not the first reviewer. There is no way he could have set the profile, (with bbbj, multi pop,etc) if all he did was talk to the lady.  Why was the second reviwer the one that set the profile?

1) The second review was actually the first one submitted. Since there are three months to submit a review, just because the first one says Feb, and the second one says March, does not mean the Feb review was submitted first.
2) The first review was held back since it was his first and her first. TER may have held it until the second review posted.
3) They were submitted in order and the first one set the review, and the second one submitted a problem report and changed everything on the profile.

Never even thought of that situation, or I would not have asked that question.  Been sick last couple days, not to mention having hard time logging on here.  It's getting to be a real pain.  I never know which version I will have to log into......

Swim

Hope you are feeling better. That log in issue really sucks when you are trying to be a host. I saw your thread on the gd board the other day. Sounds like xyz, naomi and a bunch of others had issues too, but not everyone. It's weird because I haven't had any problems logging in. (on the new site) I did have the problem when the whole site was down, and a few days of slow loading pages, but that's about it. I'm usually on my laptop or smartphone. Haven't tried on a desktop.
Anyway hope you get that solved one way or another.

The first reviewer sets the profile.  If she didn't do anything, how does he know what she provides?  That just makes no sense!!!!!  So who put all the services up there that she didn't do with the first reviewer?????

Something is def not right with this one.

Swim

but newbies should see well reviewed providers.  Agree with swim 6-10 reviews & some by vetran reviews (at least 6-10 reviews themselves).  I'm not saying to NEVER see her...  after you gain some experience yourself circle back, look at her reviews then.  Maybe she'll have more.  Your sense of what to look for will be much better.  
First reviews are always suspect until several reviewers confirm the data.  Are somre first reviews believeable...  yes.  The ones that say she offers a limited menu like CBJ, not GFE, no kiss...  these reviews are more believeable than first reviews that give a full menu, only to find that's not the case in person.    
H

Register Now!