Last month I saw a provider who was an excellent performer, but I didn't think she warranted a 10 for looks. I gave her an 8. She had pressured me to give her a 10/10, so she was a little upset.

As you say, then you've answered your own question.

They might boot her off if they found out you were being harassed.     She would probably give you a reference.     If she didn't she will only hurt herself in the long run.   People will find out and avoid her.   Just be fair that's all you can do.   Beauty is in the eye of the beholder anyway.

That way, when other ladies contact her, she can tell them you're a stingy-scorer.  They can then make an informed decision as to whether or not they want to risk having their own numbers similarly dinged.

I'm not a low-scorer. I've given out plenty of 10/10's. She's not a 10, though. The guys who give her 10's are being pressured. She only has 10/10's, so the guys who wouldn't give her a 10 either had reviews pulled or never wrote them.

you should not ask her for a referal.  
This means she now knows your TER handle.  I presume you didn't expect her to be upset...  if you expected it, you should have written a draft of your review & hidden it in a safe place (like a draft in your hobby email account).  You get up to 90 days to submit a review...  the risk is her (TER required) ad disappears so you can not submit it or it gets rejected.  Sometimes new ads can be found, however.  
So why wait? Because if you are careful not to out yourself to her, after a bit of time, she'll not be sure who you are & can't retaliate.  
Yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder...

I did expect her to be upset. She said she would like a 10/10 review and, if I couldn't give her that score, then don't write a review at all. That's why she has almost all 10/10's. She had three quick 10/10 reviews three days after mine posted, and one of those reviewers posting a Friday shill in a regional forum.

He already stated he was "pressured" for a ten/ten review, why is it the least bit unbelievable that she didn't pressure other guys? Since the advent of the "top lists" review manipulation has become quite common and there are some VERY credible reports of guys actually being blackmailed and even having their personal info "outed" in retaliation for an 8/8 review.

and I would like to be the first, and apparent ONLY person here to give you kudos for sticking to your guns.

All good points.  

First of all, 8 is NOT a bad score.  

There seems to be two categories of scores -- either they are inflated or extremely low.  I do take note of a series of extremely low scores, as that is usually indicative of some underlying issue with the provider.  

Giving someone an 8 for looks is very dam good, an 8 means she very sexy, how can anyone think that's a bad thing.

think she deserves. Without honest reviews, guys who are looking for new talent will likely be disappointed.

Deputy Fife is here to nip your comment, nip it in the bud.

It's a bad thing when the provider is trying to make the top 20 list nationally.

The body type you mention sounds athletic/androgynous. A lot of models and athletes have very narrow hips. Some people find that look extremely attractive.  

I know there are guys here who would still give such a woman a ten/ten if she told them to, but there really should be at least some minimum standards. I think we all have our own ideas about what constitutes beauty, but UGLY should not be so difficult to define. lol

That's the type of body I assumed he was describing.

As for a 26-26-26, it's not my type, but I could see a LOT more objective graders giving a woman with that type of frame giving high marks than a woman who was a 36-36-36.

It is the year 2016, and society has certain criteria for what constitutes beauty. It's not the same as the criteria in the 1950's (I was there), and not every guy subscribes to it. But enough guys do subscribe to it that, if a woman is far from meeting those criteria--a 36-36-36, for example--should would probably not receive legitimate scores of 10/10. I also think that the criteria for providers is different than for actresses.  

is EXACTLY what each of us use to come up with the score we give. That's where the whole beauty in the eye of phrase comes from.

If her appearance is different in person than any of the pictures show, then she should be able to understand that type of deduction.

Then that would be a fake review in my book... Seriously you are the reviewer so whatever or however you felt your experience was should be satisfactory.    

I'm glad you brought up the integrity behind not reviewing. If I have a better than expected time, I'd like to brag on her a little. If it was underwhelming then I try not to hurt her business with negative comments.  

I mean, a woman could have "perfect" proportions... but might not 'look' beautiful.