n page two of this board, in a thread titled Eros NYC Ads dated 9/19, a member name jeandeaux posts about a bait and switch experience with a redhead named Kelly. He goes on to say that even though the provider who answered the door was not the redhead Kelly, she was so hot that he decided to see her anyway.  

    My question is this. Does anyone know if the Kelly in question was Kelly Kinsey who has and ad up on today's TER ad board? There are not all that many real redheads around, and 2 named Kelly raised a flag. Especially since the Kelly being discussed in that thread had no reviews and no one had found much info about her.

   Kelly Kinsey has no link to reviews either. She does have a website with some great photos. She appears to be a natural redhead, but its hard to say for sure. She doesn't have that porcelain white skin that is a dead giveaway. Other than that, she has a short description of herself with a link to a professional type appointment form. She does not even post her consideration fees! WTF is up with that? She states that anyone who has questions should e-mail her at the addy on the bottom of her home page.

  I plan on doing just that, but before I waste my time and hers, I'm asking if anyone here has knowledge of her or has seen her. Is it just a coincidence that the redhead discussed on 9/19 and the redhead posting on today's Ad board are both named Kelly? If Kelly Kinsey is posting on the TER Ad board you would think that she would also be monitoring this board? No provider named Kelly ever entered the conversation on 9/19 to defend herself about the bait and switch accusations? To me, that sends up a red(head) flag as well.

I'd appreciate anyone's thoughts on this issue.

..and tell us all about it.

END OF MESSAGE

"No link" does not mean "no reviews".  A lot of other info is in her ad and her links.  She is Profile ID 249574.   "Red hair" is a trait frequently associated with the Irish so it wouldn't surprise me if red heads, fake or not, chose an Irish sounding name: Shannon, Sinead, Siobahn, ...  KELLY.  A red headed "Xiao Mei" would probably be a dye job.   Well, yes she does.  Something tells me that the red hair and hot pics disengaged your big head from your little head.  Slow down, take a deep breath and go back and read things more carefully.  Click on her other links. KK might even reply to your emails if you don't sound so breathless.  

Is Kelly Kinsey jeandeaux's Kelly?  I have no idea

@impposter:

    Thanks for the input without the snark. Being told to TOFTT is fine, but only after all available info has been shared. After all, isn't the primary purpose of this board to share information about providers and hobbyists alike? Don't hobbyists want to know about unsavory agencies, providers, or scams? Don't providers want to know about hobbyists that have issues or could be problematic?  

   I've been a TER member for 10 years, I've been away for a good while in a civilian relationship so I'm a little rusty. Thanks also for providing KK's profile ID number and pointing out that I was remiss in due diligence vis-a-vis her fees, etc. It's reassuring to know that there are still some hobbyists on the board with class, as in days past. I'm speaking of members like yourself, Crazy Diamond, WaterClone, etc. The whole idea of this site has always been to share info and give other members a "heads up" about potential land mines. In a way, the reviews are a guide line but secondary, because there is no accounting for taste.  

  One thing I have noticed, is that now every reviewer gives almost every provider a 10/10 , 9/10, or some variation? Really? A 10 is supposed to be a once in a life time experience? If the greatest sexual experience you've ever had in your life is with a provider, you have my deepest sympathy. 10 years ago, there were some 9's and 10's in the reviews, but there were also a lot of 6's and 7's! Let's face it guys, not every women can be Jennifer Lawrence on the young end or Katherine Zeta-Jones on the older end? That's why there are price points for ladies like Kate Jacobs. You can lease a BMW, or you can lease a Ferrari. The BMW is nice, but the Ferrari will cost you a lot more. Question is, how much are you wiling to pay for the ride? Are the rating anomalies because the reviewer might want to see the lady again, and feels he has to give her the highest marks possible? Or, does he think that by giving her a 10/10, she will grant him special consideration or some free time on his next visit? I'm sure these are questions that hobbyists have pondered over forever?  

 Some of us like to see as many ladies as we can afford. Some of us like to find an ATF and stay with her. Both options are kewl. The wise men on this board know better than to judge any member by the posted number of his reviews. The main thing for hobbyists, is to wake up every morning and thank whatever Gods that they pray to, for the providers that meet their sexual needs!

that TER has on the site instead of just rambling.  

Also, by naming Jennifer Lawrence and Zeta-Jones you're imposing your own rating on us of what a 10 is.

Thanks, I'll review the guidelines.

I don't see anything there that forces you to give a minimum performance score to a provider based on the services she offered or provided. So, I don't see how it addresses OP's comments re. grade inflation, at least with regard to performance scores. A provider could technically be eligible for a maximum of 10 on performance, but you could give her a 2 based on your actual experience. If I'm wrong, please correct me.
Your comments on subjectivity of appearance ratings is spot on.

Yes Ter does force you to give a lower score based on the services provided.  I've had a few reviews flagged by Ter before they could be posted because the score I assigned was too high for the performance, e.g. anal, bbbj, etc.

Take care.

there's a maximum score but no minimum. OP's point was that scores might be inflated. The guidelines don't force scores higher, just lower. So, guidelines do not address/explain his concern. If anything, without the guidelines, I guess the scores would be potentially even more inflated.

-- Modified on 9/28/2014 1:06:52 PM

END OF MESSAGE