I saw a provider that's fairly well reviewed today and I thought I would hold a little poll on whether or not I should post a review.  The reason I ask this is I wonder how many guys out there are afraid to be the bad guy?  The girl was really nice and to be honest kind of "simple", if you know what I mean.  But, there were things that had me literally running out the door and I was so turned off by certain things it is the kind of experience that makes many of us clients somewhat gun shy in the hobby.  I'm a decent guy in my early 30's who's had amazing connections with the high end providers I have seen lately, some so good I don't even want to write reviews!  

So the question is, should I post a completely honest review that would come off as mean and make me the bad guy?

 Others would rather not post it or just post a flattering review to look good on this site but wouldn't it be fair to warm potential clients what they are actually getting into?

Thoughts anyone?  Also I know everyone hates an alias but if you want to know the story ahead of time feel free to pm me with any questions.

Feel free to PM me.

Haha.. email me here if you have any questions [email protected]

No it was more of a hygiene and some other disturbing things.  I would never slam a girl just because of lack of chemistry.  A lower rating for lack of chemistry maybe, but nothing like this. She was actually very nice.  There are just some issues that I think most guys would want to know about.

...I'd err on the side of posting a review, whether it's negative or not.  Members rely on reviews to guide them to the right provider -- and to warn them away from those that should be avoided.  Without that info we all -- including you -- are at a disadvantage.

And is not fair to the lady - if she is well reviewed with good ratings by others - just because the problem might lie not on her but on....YOU.
If you comments are aimed to her looks or performance, if others loved her and you don't, them the main factor is that she is not your cup of tea, even if she is for others.
Now, if the bad experience you had refers to questions of hygiene, safety, etc that was not present on her previous reviews but it should, then you can write a honest account without 'harming' the lady just because you didn't click with her.
I have many reviews and I would say 90% are from guys I clicked and had a great time. The other 10% - which gave me lower ratings than my usual - are from guys I would not touch with a 10 feet pole in my civvy life!
Usually the bad reviews on a lady with many good ones comes from these type of guys. The ones no woman on her normal mind would EVER consider get naked and have any kind of physical contact with.

Not all women take bad reviews in stride. Some ladies will threaten to make a guy's hobbying life very difficult, or will harass him until he asks TER to take his review down.

Maybe this lady offered something that was a bit too extreme or was too indiscreet for the OP's taste...if it struck him as unpleasant, it might do the same for others. Wouldn't hobbyists rather read both positive and negative accounts, so that they might be better informed?

I agree with this poster. I recently had a guy who I bent over backward for (2 pops? I can see he was so dissatisfied) and he put up a review that was based on lack of chemistry. I think if you had a decent time but you KNOW (and he did) that the girl is having an off night (he knew because he said so in his review) then you should just not write a review.

It sounds like to me that if this has never been brought up in any other review, she had a bad night and you should give her a pass. It was probably a one-time thing.

Girls here don't generally get a lot of great reviews because men are afraid of something or someone from TER or other guys, they get them because they consistently give great service.

I would hesitate to write something disparaging about someone when it's apparent that it's not something that happens frequently. Be nice. We all have to play on the same playground.

I totally disagree.  Reviews should be honest.  Then let the customer decide if the review was correct or not.  If someone disagrees with the negative review he can always post his own review refuting what was said.  Sometimes it is a matter of "clicking" but often it's a matter of a reviewer not wanting to give a bad review even if it is justified.  The customer should be able to rely on the honesty of the review.  We should not be concerned if a review is "fair" to the lady just because it is negative.  This reluctance to give an honest review diminishes the usefulness of this site.  Any honest review is one that is "fair" to the provider even if negative and at odds with other reviews.  Sometimes its a matter of YMMV, sometimes the provider has an "off" night.  But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be commented on.  In fact, if a provider has nothing but glowing reviews I would question the honesty of some of them.  A provider can't be perfect for everyone and if she isn't right for a particular customer he should have the right and feel comfortable describing the experience and commenting on it.  After all, a review is how a particular person sees things.  Every movie reviewer doesn't agree.  That doesn't diminish the movie for someone that likes it.  

Frankly, I think it is somewhat offensive that the poster blames the reviewer and hides behind an alias.

Right you are TBM.