Three reviews in the past few days mention bareback sex, two vaginal, one anal.  

Until they get sick or get their significant other sick! You can hobby all you want but be mindful of the long term consequences of your actions. I do believe though, that since some irresponsible providers offer it, some gentlemen will take up on the offer. Nothing is certain in life but at least take calculated risks.

I could never understand how either party is willing to take this risk.  

But why not post a link to the reviews to help the rest of us out? I'm sure there are many that would prefer to avoid this type of provider.

I frequently saw a provider who I always had a great connection with who whitelisted me. Until, one day in a heated session she tried intercourse sans raincoat. I freaked out and of course refused and the session went down hill from there.  I chalked it up to her being lost in the moment but decided it would be best if I didn't see her again. A few months down the line I had a provider who decided not to see me after screening. When I asked for a honest answer as to why not, she told me because I was whitelisted by a provider who is known for her unsafe practices. The point is, if I knew this beforehand I would've avoided her like the plague.

I don't know why people make references to reviews without providing links.  Why bother?

and this is why I check the forums! I had one of those providers on my to see list.... that's a heaping dose of noooope now.

But it does make me wonder if these guys exaggerate or if these reviews are even real

From my experience dealing with all kind of people, I give the benefit of the doubt, Gina and Samantha are professionals.
Don't make any sense, IMHO

Let's hope because I had Samantha on my radar

-- Modified on 6/30/2015 10:51:02 PM

Heh. The first reviewer says the condom prevented rear entry, but it went in just fine sans raincoat. That's some close tolerance!

After BB anal, she might just BE.....

First, thanks to garvin_fred101 for posting the actual reviews. Because I hate cryptic posts.  

After the thread gained steam two of the posts were edited to remove the specific and detailed references to BB. You should have read the thread back on 6/30 and not today on 7/07.

I don't check TER every day.

Did you read all the comments after I posted the three reviews?  Did you find it odd there were references to activity that you couldn't find?  But you automatically assumed that people can't read.  Be careful next time you see a thread with a hot button topic that is several days old. Not everything is what it seems.  Peace.