Since I will never send my $180 in small,unmarked bills - I recently was read aloud several of the recent reviews posted on JAG. One salient point became crystal clear as I listened to the tortured, sophomoric, and thoroughly adolescent prose. These reviews posted by the developmentally challenged do not assist my researches on various providers. The Jag authors generally appear to be pompously inept misogynists; hell bent on providing painfully detailed accounts of their "vulva and labia" adventures. I suppose if I were compiling a list of Top 100 "useless" details about providers, Jag could become my exclusive source material. One recent reviewer made special note of his provider's "willingness" to "accept direction" during their encounter. This might be important if I were researching personality characteristics for specific breeds of "canine" companion. My personal preference is a "partner" with whom I can fully experience and explore the joy of pure carnal,hedonistic pleasures; not a talented Australian Shepard who will "roll over" and whisper pornographic barks at my command. I am hopeful this board will offer a very different experience for its devotees and occasional guests. The "old boys club" tradition easily found at other sights should remain in the archives or at other sites. I personally will not post graphic written details of my encounters. I therefore solemly promise never to insult the casual browser with detailed descriptions of the 'color' of a particular providers vaginal secretions during orgasmic moments of joy!!!  --modified by richardrzhpippin at Sun, Mar 04, 2001, 15:56:11--modified by richardrzhpippin at Fri, Mar 09, 2001, 02:55:33