I was just wondering if the # of reviews a provider has is in some way proportionate to the total volume a provider might see. In other words...if a provider sees 10 clients a week, how many of those visits would be reviewed? I know that it would vary with different providers and other variables come into play but, would like to get some feedback on this.

Some girls are very high volume, but don't get reviewed at all.

Some girls are relatively low volume, but ask every client to review them.

Some have a lot of reviews simply from being on the site a long time.

Why do you want to know if someone is high volume or not?  It's not an indicator of performance, nor of health.  If you want someone who doesn't have sex with a lot of guys, well, you are definitely looking in the wrong place.  

It's not an issue of health or performance...esp. the latter...for that is the stuff for which reviews are posted. I guess I was in a round-about-way trying to determine if one is a high volume provider. Again, that is also subjective! Low volume for one is high for another and vis-versa. Obviously, I'm searching in the wrong place if I'm seeking someone who doesn't have alot of clients!

I am a 'low-volume' independent who formerly worked for a 'high-volume' agency ($300-400/hr). For what it's worth, I enjoy my job much more and find that my level of performance has risen. Clients used to be one of about three to eight for the day - now, a client who books me is definitely the only one of the day and possibly the week's only date. Therefore, I am much more prepared and enthusiastic. I am much more open to having a genuine experience with my clients.

When I worked for an agency, I was constantly sore, dry, and having yeast infections and painful swelling/bruising. Now, I am excited and wet for every appointment and able to enjoy myself fully. Also, while I would always try to shower or at least wash off between appointments, it happened a few times that I'd have barely enough time to straighten the room to make it look like somebody else hadn't just left. We'd get appts right on top of one another, and the guys would always try to stay until the very last minute (or even later). One guy would leave at :59, another one would be waiting in the lobby, the agency would be blowing up the phone asking when was OK to let him up, since they'd told him I'd be done 15 min ago (at the 45 minute mark when he'd booked an hour)...you get the picture. A quick washcloth rinse was about all I could manage. And I'm sure that there are girls who didn't even bother. Now, I worked briefly for a different agency who gave the girls time in between the appointments, and the owner would make sure to tell the girls to shower in between...but for the most part, it's get 'em in, get 'em out - pronto! Less wasted time = maybe an extra half hour squeezed in = more money for the agency!!

While I had my favorites, and my good days, I didn't appreciate my clients very much back then. For one thing, they had lower expectations and their treatment of me mirrored that...some were nice, but a lot were jerks and VERY rough (I have never been treated like that as an independent).

So I believe that if a gent wants a partner who is truly prepared to see him (hygenically and emotionally), and enthusiastic, he should choose a lower-volume lady. While some ladies might enjoy the constant stream of new faces and get a sexual high off of high-volume (that can happen, but frustration and soreness are more common side effects of that working model) it's physically and emotionally very challenging. So, IMO, volume IS important.

I realize that all girls are different, etc. etc...but I talked a lot to the other girls, and we complained A LOT. We grudged them every extra minute they spent with us and bristled at all of the rudeness and rough-handling. It was definitely a more client-hating side of the business (although we did appreciate the nice guys and the tippers). Although I do realize that some independents can be client-haters as well, even the pricier ones...I think it's less likely. If I were a client, honestly, I'd not book with an agency.

As for the OP's question, I think that less reviews can sometimes mean lower volume, but not always. It's impossible to tell. But if she is not being reviewed and still working actively, then maybe she is either seeing a lot of regulars, does more extended dates (those gents tend not to review), or only escorts part-time. I'd say that many reviews spread out over a short period of time probably mean that she's high-volume.

thank you for your candor. It was interesting reading your response.
Something I guess most of us know, but don't really wnat to think about.
Good to get an insider view.

I believe this is probably the most truthful, insighful essay written by any provider on the subject of high volume houses, low volume houses, greed, health, cleanliness and indies. Please keep up the great essays and please provide further insight into the true nature and greed of house owners, including the bookers greed of over booking to enhance thier paychecks.  Bravo!!!!!

My opinion is that the more reviews the higher the volume exponentially.  Example:  If 1:3, 1:5 write reviews of a provider and that provider has 50 reviews then they have seen anywhere from 150-250 clients in that time period.
Now, take into account all those who never review for any purpose or reason then you also have the factor of no shows on the review boards.
So, in general - the more reviews the higher the volume the provider, the higher the security risks, the higher the health risks.
It takes effort and fore-thought for a reviewer to compose and post a review.  People generally do not exert any extra effort in life.
regulars might write a review the 1st time visiting and not anytime thereafter, but that is volume.
A true indicator of volume is attempt to make an appt and see if you get your desired time or how far out you are pressed, thereby knowing she is busy, busy, busy.

There are a few reasons why you cannot accurately gauge a provider's volume, judging by the number of reviews she has accumulated.

There are situations where a provider might dissuade her clients from posting reviews.  As a result, that provider is reviewed less frequently.

If a provider encourages reviews, there will be more reviews about her.

If a provider only sees regular clients, those clients will not review her, after each date.

If a provider sees more new clients, she might be reviewed more frequently.  

Providers also change their volume level, sometimes, so a provider with many reviews may have been higher volume, in the past.  However, there is no way you would know she reduced her volume, just by looking at her quantity of reviews.

Thank you for your insightful explanation! Perhaps in my optimistic imagination, I would like to believe that all providers think like you! Business is business, and I understand that. I am not judging how a provider runs their business, but I whole heartedly agree with your statement that volume is important when seeking a quality woman. Perhaps we should meet!

I think the concept of a provider who is an Indie or one that works for an agency that prides itself on the quality of the ladies, emotionally, physically and time orientations vs the "fast houses, high volume houses" and reviews.

The fast houses/high volume houses that charge 200-250 p/hr and allow halfs at 140-160 p/hhr  are there to get you in and get you out just as the poster who worled in the industry and suffered this type of abuse.  I agree that the ladies are pressed back to back whereby they cannot tend to their personal hygiene, prep the room, relax and have a need to get lost on drug abuse to escape the physical and emotional abuse they are facing seeing 10 clients a day for 5-6 days a week, never looking at the persons face, caring about the desires of the client-just goin gthru the motions - pop-pop gone, NEXT as they say in the post office.

Ladies that work these establishments face higher risks regarding security, health, STD's etc (they never have time to attend a phyicians office working noon to midnight.

I term workers that work these hours for whatever reason trafficked individuals even if they are doing this on their own free will.

What needs can a person have to abuse themselves this way and attempt to have a social life thereafter the biz or in the future?