TER is obviously geared to the hobbyist rating providers and sharing information on providers with other hobbyists. That said, I have often wondered what it would look like if it were the other way around - the providers rated the hobbyists, and what juicy details they would share. How interesting it would be to see this little world from a different lens.
Hopefully there are a few ladies out there who for fun and enlightenment would be willing to post a mock (or real) review of their typical experience with a client. Obviously discretion is paramount, so feel free to use aliases yourselves and certainly change the names or handles of the client. What would you rate the client on? Looks? Performance? Perhaps cleanliness and manners. How much of a gentleman he is? What other info would you share? Is he manscaped or a jungle down below? Is he well endowed or smaller than your pinky finger? Is he a good kiser? A minute man or a marathon man? Does he do DATY and, if so, how good are his skills? One shot and done, or an MSOG guy? Or maybe few of those things matter to you and it comes down to other qualities that you prefer or loathe. What details would you share if any?
Come on ladies, let's liven things up a bit. Enlighten us today.
And Happy Thanksgiving to all!
- Spartan
Few providers would likely care to do this. For the most part, most are in this for reasons other than sampling and comparing the sexual performance of a variety of men.
From what I've heard, as well as what I've seen up closer than I probably should have, this is about tolerance. How much unpleasantness can one escort tolerate from a particular client. One year one escort told me that it was nauseating whenever one particular "regular" client went down on her. But like clients, escorts also have "ATFs" they actually enjoy fucking and/or spending time with.
Most would be unlikely to want to spend their precious free time writing reviews of guys and almost all would be uncomfortable disclosing their honest views publicly. It would likely make their regulars (and prospects) either jealous or angry.
One now-retired escort fulfilled a personal fantasy of mine and wrote a "your eyes only" review of our last (and best) session. I have not, and will not, share it with anyone. But what fascinated me was not the content of her review but her perspective. She focused on her plans for the session, her emotional responses, and her thoughts about how I responded to her actions. It was not mechanical or as visceral as the reviews guys typically write. In this case, we knew each other very very well (over a year) and the session was 75% of her dominating me (blindfolds, toys, etc.), as we had planned, which was different than how we usually got down. Again, what was so refreshing (and embarrassing) about her review was that it was mostly "Big Head" rather than "Little Head" (or rather it was mostly "Big Heart"). Unfortunately, I doubt I'll ever have the chance to be with her again given her retirement. We had amazing times together and reading her review of our session always brings huge smiles, and major wood.
I may revisit this thread 
In the meantime, "Spartan" as in like '300' the movie...one of my favs. I'd like to hear what your handle means if you wouldn't mind Mr. 8474.
Part of what I pay for is discretion. I'm not interested in reading about other guys from a woman's perspective, and I do not want girls I spend time with to share information broadly. Look somewhere else.
Same with these reviews.
Ladies get paid to make you feel like the king of the universe for an hour or two or 20.
We get paid for fantasy, illusion, escape from reality.
Reviews of actual clients (no matter how anonymous) may shutter these fantasies along with some egos.
Thanks BT for sharing your insights on this topic which I suspect are pretty spot on. And yes Carn, obviously discretion is key in this hobby as I assume aliases would be used and names changed to protect the innocent or guilty. Perhaps DDDbabe said it best when it comes to not ruining the fantasy and illusion we hobbyists seek.
The real purpose of this exercise was to get a sense from the providers point of view what are the characteristics of a good client and a session that is more enjoyable for them. Conversely, what kind of clients are dreaded and require oscar worthy performances to get through. With some of these nuggets, a few of us hobbyists might be able to further enhance on our experiences going forward. Maybe it is as simple as asking what providers ask each other about us we hen checking our references... And please, no flames that this belongs on the newbie board.
Happy Thanksgiving New York!
-Spartan
1) Contacts us via email and has all screening info ready
2) Shows up on time
3) Places envelope before heading to the shower
4) Polite
5) Leaves on time
Slightly different for outcall/longer dates, but you get the idea.
This is really THAT simple 
Why are there so many ISO posts? There's NY Ads that are clearly visible if you want to connect with someone. It seems that for the amazing city that NY is, the board doesn't reflect that at all.
I think the OP was trying to simply get a glimpse of real thoughts from women. Perhaps not a review per se, so I'll share some filtered through a specific experience.
Recently I had an experience with someone completely new to this, a very attractive young and stressed out guy, whom by the way I would totally hook up with regardless. I'm not sure how long it had been since he'd been intimate, but my guess is due to work, perhaps a while, the job is crazy demanding. I blew him and then he asked for 69, I obliged, and it must have been very intense that he came, in fact, said "stop", but about 2 seconds too late. I felt a little bad because it seemed he had wanted to last longer or maybe not cum from blowing, but I made it clear it wasn't a problem in terms of having so much time left that we could get back to doing it again. Second time we did mutual masturbation and seeing me touch myself released the second. We tried for penetration on a third but couldn't quite make it. I had a GREAT time since I came twice as well, but I don't know whether the fact that there was no penetration will be a disappointment, I wanted to inquire, but I didn't, I truly hope it wasn't.
