The post you cited is very interesting. Especially as it coincides with two new strong reviews in the 9's in February, at least one of which was from a reputable reviewer. How does one reconcile that with the admitted substitution by Sonya Olsen and the multiple bros taken for a ride already (hence the multiple mediocre reviews)? I do not find the new AF's explanations for the suspect reviewers, SO story, and possible "ring" compelling either. She argues that reviews by those like "jamadison" are real and that the shadowy American female was not a madam/ handler but an appointment screener. She now says that SO is not her friend but was just supposed to pick up some business for her profile.
However, still concerning, BCing says that around the time of her post (mid-Feb), this AF began contacting all the reviewers who gave mediocre reviews to offer freebies in return for, ahem, fresh takes on their experiences (ie, rewriting their reviews). People are directed to a location where the SO encounters took place, which is different from where the original AF hosted incall. My conclusions:
-- Modified on 3/1/2014 1:59:21 PM
The post you cited is very interesting. Especially as it coincides with two new strong reviews in the 9's in February, at least one of which was from a reputable reviewer. How does one reconcile that with the admitted substitution by Sonya Olsen and the multiple bros taken for a ride already (hence the multiple mediocre reviews)? I do not find the new AF's explanations for the suspect reviewers, SO story, and possible "ring" compelling either. She argues that reviews by those like "jamadison" are real and that the shadowy American female was not a madam/ handler but an appointment screener. She now says that SO is not her friend but was just supposed to pick up some business for her profile.
However, still concerning, BCing says that around the time of her post (mid-Feb), this AF began contacting all the reviewers who gave mediocre reviews to offer freebies in return for, ahem, fresh takes on their experiences (ie, rewriting their reviews). People are directed to a location where the SO encounters took place, which is different from where the original AF hosted incall.
My conclusions:
1. Some provider who is more like the original AF than SO is back to providing service which has merited higher scores.
2. There is still behavior suspicious for an organized agency/ring going on.
Get your nut on at your own risk. Be careful what review deals you strike.
Chances are, if you show up at the midtown location you are taking on more risk than others.
Only time will tell if the back story is true.
Hilariously, her rate is now up to $700 on Eros.
O TEH LULZ.
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
