Has anyone been with or have seen any reviews on SNOW from Kama Sutra? Check out her pics.

Checked everywhere, came up dry.

Also, any new information on Kama Sutra?  How is security, quality of appearance of the incall, open-minded girls, quality of the women, glad to have the clientle in this rough economy, treat clientle correctly?

House rules- (like Julies requires girls to treat clientle correctly-wink-wink).

Appreciate an immediate reply

Amazing what a new set of photos can do...I am seeing her in a new way too...maybe on Tuesday..I will let you know what occurs.

Hello Ted Spiker:

Snows old pics were also great but the new pics are awesome.

Gives her a new youthful look.

Would really appreciate a detailed review.

Have been to KS several times and some of the girtls are sweet and innocent and others are very cold and professional.

Everything I heard about Snow aka Tina have been she is a WILD WOMEN who takes contol and drains you completely of all energy.

Let me know if she is still into her Greek trick.  If she is ask her to perform it for you. Never experience sex like that before and probably never will.  Her muscle control is outrageous if she still is what she was years ago.

Details detail details PLEASE- on the discussion board not on a TER review.  

Thanks.

-- Modified on 6/29/2003 6:12:10 PM

Whitelightening....

First you ask for info on Snow, then you provide this post with detailed info on her technique...its like you set us up for a raving ad for this provider,

Who are you? What is the game here?

And by now you know that I do not allow detailed posts that belong in reviews. Its one of my very basic rules. And I really don't take kindly for your call to break the rules....

I am so very anxious for your reply.

blur  

PS, I'm leaving your Snow ad up to make this point, I'll drop the whole thread very soon....

-- Modified on 6/29/2003 6:23:50 PM

On April 26 you wrote:

"Does anyone have any reviews on Snow from Kama Sutra?
Please give details, do not want to take one for the team again.
Limited hours, but awesome looking/kinky PSE wild?"

Man I smell a rat here....

blur

But it's so much easier for LE if the details are in the discussion board. . . . .  

Ironically,
-Hoot.

Why does a post on the discussion board carry more credibility than a review?

I'm starting to smell a rat too.


-- Modified on 6/30/2003 5:54:09 AM

-- Modified on 6/30/2003 5:55:39 AM

in White Lightning....

I believe he played a gangster with a "mother" complex
"you dirty rat"...I think Jimmy said his famous line in that movie...not sure...the plot thickens

A discussion held on the board is more communicative than when it is shilled on the TER review.  Just look at the TER review board, all shilled.  The reviews mount everyday from Julies one after another on Julies like Julie herself on a slow day is just writing one after another.

No counterpoint to argue with.

Just a shilled review raving about how good things always are.

Very rarely see anything under a 6 review and most are 8 and 9's.

No counterpoint.  Time for argument and counterpoint as to one vs another, was she the same with you as me, not a simple YMMV.  We need heated debate and that is te only way to get it.

And if BLUR has not noticed, some providers have taken to answering posts on this board and then tagging their site as a link just for the FREE advertising. Alexis and Village Girls and Houston are three that come to mind.  They comment with a simple sentence to form the basis of legitimacy then they hook the link at the botom.  Same with alot of Asian providers AMP's.

Other boards have simple old reviews on KS and Snow along with the other girls there, that is information is culled from.

Tryinging to find out if this is shill info or accurate.  KS changed ownership just after the reviews were posted as well as their location.  

Clearly stated that I have been to KS but never with the providers I questioned about.

Check your TER review site and you will see that you have ZERO revews on SNOW, why is that when she has been around so long.  Even someone like Bill Furniture has had to be with her, he has had thounsands based on his stories.

KS has gotten almost too blah lately. Changed ownership ? That well could be. The whole 'tude over there has become more assembly line. Long ago they had a whole lotta soul. Real hard quality to explain but you defintely know it when you feel it. Now, this could well be temper of the times also. We are all wading through deflationary low cash flow, low energy situations... even my former ATF tells me regularly that she's having the damndest time getting business anywhere close to her heyday, and if you knew who she was, you'd think that a ridiculous claim, in light of her reputation. Overall, you would meet great babes that did their bit of business and moved on, whew, still remember the beautiful green eyed raven hair porcelain skin Leah or a couple of the loveliest, most refined Venezuelans... every now and then you meet up with a firecracker but most of 'em are slogging it out, making the rent, paying down the credit cards. That drags down the tone of the now infrequent real reviews and ups the desperation level when it comes to authoring these mocumentary epics of sphichter flexing and squirting with enough power to splat spiders off the ceiling.... meanwhile in the shill-o-rama department observant consumers may have noticed a flurry of inventive prose about the staff at Sensual Touch and East Of Paradise. Their websites appear to have identical design and the heh, "reviews" are so indistinguishable from one another that they must have all been written in a single sitting and under the influence of a higher potency opoid medication, Dilaudid washed down with a nice cold korean beer or a Byuk Gye Soo and a steaming bowl of chicken foot soup to get the ol' creative juices flowing...

-- Modified on 6/30/2003 11:02:14 AM

i still don't get it, you know every detail about KS, Snows alias and secret moves, and every other Snow review on the web.

what do you want from us?

blur

There are 1 or 2 exceptions to my opinion. And whitelightning doesn't meet those.

whitelighteing doesn't have any reviews yet tries to come across as someone that has experience with some of the women. Now he poses a question and answers it himself, then justifies his answer with culling info from another review board yet doesn't believe any of the reviews on TER.

Suggestion to whitelightning, get a VIP membership, write some real reviews, gain some credibility, then maybe some of us will take you seriously.

...than I would from whitelightening. And at least she has reviews for that matter. As far as linking her site to her responses, I thank her for some afternoon "eye candy". That doesn't mean she is a shill. That makes her a smart business woman.

And BTW that advertising that you are calling FREE allows us Hobbyists to meet someone that may have flown under the radar.

I'm really happy with the NY Discussion Board. It has come a long way since I first started this hobby. I see new legit "handles" getting involved all the time.

I hope Blur does shut whitelightening down. He's a self important lurking blowhard that would rather bash a system that work with it.




-- Modified on 6/30/2003 12:54:02 PM

WHAT I AM LOOKING FOR ARE RECENT REVIEWS, NOT OLD ( 3 yr old rut).

There are NONE on your glorious New York Review boards about Snow or very few about anyone from KS.

Why is that? They do not pay for advt space?

Then look at the reviews written about Julies- how many in a row does it not start making it look like a shill.  10 in a row some days all about Julies girls.  Especially the girls that have been panned are popping up more frequently, thats called trying get gain interest in a slug by hyping the slug.  Marylin has been dogged badly on your boards but her great reviews pop up on a daily basis- thats not shilling- Come on wake up to the board beyond your keyboard. No set of TER member are going to Julies and sampling by chance all 10 girls working that day.  Look at Julies sit, see who is the featured girl Marylin, the worst panned reviews so Marlin pays Julie to be featrured to drum up new suckers and Juklie writes reviews on her girls.  I have been in Julkies place and she is sitting at the keyboard with you log in osted on the screen and she is typing away.  Who is anyone fooling.

You also have rules about girls posting as advt more than once a month sdo they cover there tracks by calling it a reveiw with a link to their advt- Ban that and then we would see them stop writing because theycannot advt a tag with the comment.  Ban the link Blur, thats your job.

And why is the review section more secure than the open board, any LE can log into the review board or pay the fee to be a VIP and then see the same info.  Stop providing fase security to those that pay or sign up.  Any NYC public library gives access to your site with a false e mail at hotmail or juno or msn and they could be LE checking on places even from their desk.

You do not know the keyboard site only the ISP

Then go there and when you're through, write an honest review in the review section.

I am looking to avoid taking one for the team and getting honest facts.  Why wste my hard earned money and time on a loser when a honest review would shield the team.  Thats what the board and reviews are all about.

Exactly, so do your share and post some reviews. You say you've seen alot of the women you talk about , yet you write no reviews.

Time to shit or get off the pot.

constantly pulled ladies' profiles because of discovery of self posting.

Maybe you are unfamiliar with this site.  Many members in LA and I presume in other cities as well had often alerted and notified Staff and members about suspicious reviews.  Many others also provide valuable info on ladies that are yet reviewed.  

Your 1st and 2nd post about this lady expose serious doubts about the motive behind your inquiry.  One of the great things about TER is that other members can check up on you have posted before and see whether there are any inconsistency in your reasoning.

So far you have not answered Blur's points directly.