I understand the need for airbrushing in advertising.  In an effort to attract clients you want to present the best possible product.  Removing a few stretch marks or making breasts seem fuller is all fine and well.  The trick though is to make it appear natural, and not go so far as to change the review to "not an accurate representation" of the provider.  For the most part I will not even consider seeing someone when I feel this is the case.  What about the rest of you guys?

I hear that a lot of girls don't wear makeup for their dates and I personally got called out in a review once for not being as glammed up as I was in my pics.
To be fair to me, the reviewer also stated that it was a noon date and I asked if I could be a little late.
I was trying to do the rest of the makeup!  I'm usually as I am in my pics, full makeup and lingerie.
Does that make a difference to you guys or not?
Looking for the general answers of course, there's always one or two like my reviewer.  

BB

No BB, makeup doesnt make a difference for me and would not deter me from seeing her, and I would not mark her down in her reviews unless it was a serious difference.  I may however consider a provider who provides a few candid non glams, where she was just as stunning as with the make up, over another.

Everybody does it. You think the Kardashian gang looks like they do in their weekly appearances in "Us Weekly"? Playboy centerfolds do it, Joan Rivers does it, politicians do it. That's life. Get over it!

where the skin looks 'too' perfect. I've seen a number of galleries where you can tell they airbrushed like crazy. There is no depth to the skin. They look almost 'plastic'. Gals, it is okay to show some freckles. If your profile says you are in your 30's or older, we expect a little 'character' to your skin tone.

Ironically, I see this phenomena of over airbrushing more in the 5-7 'roses' crowd. I've learned to avoid those who airbrush too much.