So I was reading reviews and I came across Jordan's profile with two reviews.  I personally love a young and all natural girl so I was initially very intrigued. As I was reading one of the two reviews posted, I read something that was an immediate red flag. The reviewer mentions for the  "appropriate compensation" that she agreed to allow bareback FS. What makes this even more suspicious is he said that he had a second session with provider and his GF.  So my question is, do you think the reviewer is being honest? I was going to book an appointment with Jordan but now I am uneasy as if this is true she clearly doesn't take her health too seriously. Below is a link to the review. Also, not trying to start another BBFS thread discussing how we all can't believe stuff like this happens and how wrong it is. Just wanted to hear people's thoughts about this particular matter. Has anyone seen Jordan? Or anyone familiar with the hobbyist who wrote review?  
Thanks in advance  for any input.  
http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1505536

That's not an agency, it's an ad site.  GinasGFEs is an agency.
2) I have no idea who the two reviewers are, or if the review in question (whether about BBFS or anything else) is accurate.

your style of writing seems to be that of a female. It sounds like someone doesn't want this woman to be successful.

I strongly suspect The Sugar is 1) shilling the agency (other review is GinaGFE girl too) or 2) writing for free VIP days. Not going to discuss BBFS. Whole scenario as described is absurd. My real guess: Sugar is a teenager on his mom's computer. Could be jerking off to reading reviews with his VIP status right now.  

You couldn't be more wrong. I am most certainly not a female and to be honest, if she were really doing BBFS than I wouldn't be surprised if it helped her business. But believe what you would like.  

I saw her. BBFS didn't come up. She doesn't allow CIM.

It's clear that anytime the term is posted here, people don't agree with it. IF it happens, it happens discreetly. If you really wanted to know whether the review was fake, you could've just asked if anyone had seen her. Instead you went into a dissertation on why you were wondering, pointed to the review. As an agency, if the owner views TER then they were probably pissed, as that would not not be something they want advertised, all agencies want to come off as being "safe".

That agency used to be notorious for encouraging and even pressuring girls to do unsafe acts. The association of bbfs/with that owner/namesake has been posted on this board previously.