It should be on the Friday shill post-

With 85 reviews, one would think you would know better.

your "fun facts" should not be a disguise for shilling- especially since only VIP can see both sets.

Nice try.

Of Leanne's last ten reviews, she has eight identical sets of very good numbers in a row, bookended by 2 which would average the same as the eight. Just a "fun fact to know".

-- Modified on 12/16/2011 7:50:29 AM

I didn't give her those scores trying to "match" the others, so, yeah: She's consistently good!  

Dude (or Dudette), why do you care?  It's no big deal!

-- Modified on 12/16/2011 4:24:41 PM

...based on the observation that 2late modified his post, that means that it automatically had to go thru the moderator for approval. You should have caught that legalbeagle.
The moderator approved it...should be OK by you, then. Maybe the moderator thought this fun fact to know was no different than recent similar postings about Halle Moore's and Hilary Holiday's noteworthy performance.

Way to go, Leanne!

I am blushing enough to heat up the entire state!

Kisses!
Leann

finding out who is and isn't consistant, who NCNS's, and who tries to scam us.

Using an alias, I suspect you are just a jealous provider who wishes she was being shilled.

I'm not going to waste much time on this especially for a critic who hides behind an alias. First, I have never seen Leanne. 2nd, I have no plans to (no offense Leanne you are obviously a fine provider). 3rd, I don't shill!

It was simply an observation of many identical numbers in a row. I also didn't intend to question the validity of any of those numbers.

The Leanne 2Late saw spells her name ending with an E. Mine does not. If you checked out his reviews, you would be able to figure out that my name was misspelled in the OP thus it would be safe to assume we have not seen each other, & disqualifying it as a shill.

No offense taken 2Late. The wonderful thing about this hobby is the vast variety of options to meet the needs, & desires of everyone.

Happy hobbying everyone!

They are called trolls.

I don't think that's a shill.
More like just facts.  

I remember a few years ago you could see basic information about providers, including review scores, without paying money, it was the reviews themselves that were off limits and the details of experiences.

Can you really be upse twhen the boards are plagued by shilling when that's the only way people can find out information?   Most of the preview text for reviews  isn't even a preview or overview of any sorts, it's just "I arrived at her place and......"

I understand the bills don't pay for themselves, but there'd be less shilling and "how is this provider?"   if you could get mor einformation otherwise,  or even if search worked (I find a lot of the time it'll return people who don't match any of the values I searched by at all.)

If this is truly about "fun facts" may you should have included any provider that would have had "good" matching numbers for a series of reviews-
Halle?
Halle and Hilary?
Hilary?
and who knows who else.

As a legalbeaglewannabe I rest my case.  I have no issue with the provider mentioned.  And I am male.

And after a recent survey of words that have the biggest negatives....

whatever and "just saying"