I'm coming to Minnesota for the first time on business the beginning of November for the first time.

Staying in Bloomington/St. Paul area
Any suggestion for a good GFE provider?

Alex is very good and does incall from xxxxxxxxx.
Best bbbj, doggy-style, you name it, and only $$.
Many good reviews.  612-xxx-xxxx

-- Modified on 10/24/2005 1:14:38 AM

We can't post a ph# and what town their incall is in in the text body!
It's is ok though to cut & paste a link to her ad or site .......... I realize that ends up doing the same thing, but it is all about "where" that info originates from........

As far as mentioning BBBJs and such here on the board - I want to allow this type of open discussion as much a  possible, but let's all consider the privacy of each lady before "speaking for them" as to what they will do and for how much - Some don't mind when we discuss this stuff, but some get all weird and crazy about it! (and some are just "weird and crazy" regardless! - lol!)

-- Modified on 10/24/2005 10:50:58 AM

If all we do is repeat that she offers a service that is clearly documented in her reviews, then what is the problem?

The difference is this is a "public" board, meaning it can be viewed without a membership or without even logging in. The "members only" side of the reviews is where such "intimate details"  can and should be viewed.
  I want us to be "free" to discuss cbj/bbbj, cim, Russian, Greek, Asian, ect, ect, on this board as long as we are respectful to the wishes of the provider as to what she does or doesn't want posted. My post wasn't meant as warning shot, just a reminder and I'd X'd out the "TMI" parts as an example - But still, we should not be posting contact info or the location of  an incall in the text body - a link to an ad or site in the proper URL box at the bottom of the post is better - That way the provider is in control of "how-much information" is publicly viewable...... Also, I'm ok with a cut and paste of a photo into the "picture URL" box from provider ads , but not from any website or other source that is not "publicly viewable".

(The "real problem" I think is that the board has been running rather smoothly, and  so few people are moderated anymore, that I was making myself "overly useful" - I'm just lacking anything really important to do! LOL!)

Point taken and I can see the value in being careful about the level of detail posted on the board.  I just want to make sure we can also communicate the needed information efficiently and that we understand what the standards are.