Minnesota

This is an odd one ...
mark.4444 9 Reviews 1569 reads
posted

There are a few conflicting oddd things:

1) Who uses a handles like 7654?
2) What provider does escort outcalls at $75/hour? Or even $100? Designed to attract the naive?
3) Pics and writing style on myproviderguide (post ID 4182940, 4170808) don't match the BP ad.
4) An older, but still recent BP ad doe not disguise the phone number: http://minneapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/100-1hr-only-whiteguys-very-busty-kinky-full-figured-beauty-dangeroursl-19/7113001
4) Pic not to good to be true, but not bad and shows her face.
5) How do you know her breasts are "droopy" if she never got undressed?
6) She called back but didn't offer the money back or a new meet?


Conclusions? (other than there's no way I would have called her with all that going on)

A) A real newbie with no clue? A genuine ripoff.
B) A provider using gorilla counter marketing. Hmmm, could be.
C) Who knows? An angry ex-boyfriend lashing out at her. Why not?
D)

It is suspicious but not obvious to me yet what's what.There might be more to research (like calling her up or PM'ing the reviewer) but it's time for me to try to get back to sleep!

First time reviewer of a first time reviewed girl but this time he slams her as a rip-off.  Equally suspicious in my book.

HobbyCity1125 reads

This sort of stuff happens more often than you think on BP. The review is consistent with a ripoff.

This was basically a setup or a staged robbery which is consistent with BP. The reviewer is lucky he didn't get hurt as I have read much worse.

Don't be dismissive of the review's authenticity because it is a first time reviewer of a previously unreviewed provider.

Now are you willing to go investigate and get back to us?

I am well aware this sort of thing actually does happen.  I simply felt it worth noting that the review itself is suspicious IMHO.  But she's not my type so I won't be calling regardless.

There are a few conflicting oddd things:

1) Who uses a handles like 7654?
2) What provider does escort outcalls at $75/hour? Or even $100? Designed to attract the naive?
3) Pics and writing style on myproviderguide (post ID 4182940, 4170808) don't match the BP ad.
4) An older, but still recent BP ad doe not disguise the phone number: http://minneapolis.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/100-1hr-only-whiteguys-very-busty-kinky-full-figured-beauty-dangeroursl-19/7113001
4) Pic not to good to be true, but not bad and shows her face.
5) How do you know her breasts are "droopy" if she never got undressed?
6) She called back but didn't offer the money back or a new meet?


Conclusions? (other than there's no way I would have called her with all that going on)

A) A real newbie with no clue? A genuine ripoff.
B) A provider using gorilla counter marketing. Hmmm, could be.
C) Who knows? An angry ex-boyfriend lashing out at her. Why not?
D)

It is suspicious but not obvious to me yet what's what.There might be more to research (like calling her up or PM'ing the reviewer) but it's time for me to try to get back to sleep!

HobbyCity976 reads

that the review could have been posted by an angry ex boyfriend or ex pimp.

I do however think that the rate on the BP ad, $ 75 lends credence to the reviewer's description and type of operation this is i.e. a setup to rob. This couple was looking for cash fast. What better way to put an ad on BP at a low rate and have the phone ring off the hook.

What keeps me shaking my head and this happened a bunch of times is why would a guy that knows about TheEroticReview go for that? I think the guy was making his decision strictly based on price and as low as he could find.

The irony is he went for two hours. At that price he could have received a much better experience on BP for an hour had he done his research. I understand the allure of BP, CV and CL and good value for money can still be had on those sites with a little research.

Forgive me...I couldn't resist  ;)

..how can the guy bust into the place if it were an outcall. Wouldn't the reviewer have had control of the location if it were outcall?

It's indicated in the review.

And note the comma in the location part of the ad. It's a little weird, but technically it suggests incall and outcall are possibilities.

Having fallen victim to this sort of scam myself on one occasion, there are a number of things that ring true to me in the review:

- these scams are usually done from a residence - an appartment
- the extremely low price is designed to ensnare the inexperienced hobbyist - and notice that he forked out 150 for two hours (pretty gullible to go that far)
- it went down exactly like it happened to me although I had fallen for a higher price offering, and the follow-up apology designed to somehow add credibility to the angry bf ploy.  
- i think its quite probable that the apt was not her own - probably had access somehow to an apt that they knew would be vacant at the time.  

I think the reason for it being his first review was that it is either his review alias (note there is no envelope icon next to his name which might be an indication of that) or he has created a separate account just for the purpose of this review because he is too embarassed to admit it under his normal handle.   I think something like this would have warranted a post on the board here though.  

If it were motivated as a malicious attack against the provider its  a pretty creative story and I think a simple rip-off account would have been more credible.  

-- Modified on 2/20/2012 4:41:47 AM

Register Now!