Minnesota

TER has been lax
lockstock 229 Reviews 154 reads
posted

about screening reviews in order to get volume up again.  
Getting rid of local mods made fakes ever more likely and it's been bad.
One thing a knowledgeable local board can do is hold the BS artists to some sort of account.  In the past TER has not allowed posts as blatant as the OP in this thread. Just thought I'd test the waters :-) and establish a bit more precedent.

What do you have to say for yourself Sirmix?
https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/detail/luna-bella-review-by-sirmix-2222817

There’s a couple other very recent reviews that are questionable. The clues are in the review details, plus a recent thread here.

With TER going the review for VIP access route this place is going to be littered with fake reviews.

jeremyclarckson141 reads

Ter has always had that model

Has been their model as long as I remember   but this site stands way above the other pictures site for reliability.
Do think though that the fakes are more prevalent then in the past  
Personally look for reviewers that have seen some crossover providers and how they describe her and the experience before trusting.

about screening reviews in order to get volume up again.  
Getting rid of local mods made fakes ever more likely and it's been bad.
One thing a knowledgeable local board can do is hold the BS artists to some sort of account.  In the past TER has not allowed posts as blatant as the OP in this thread. Just thought I'd test the waters :-) and establish a bit more precedent.

LAX is very gratuitous
Soon will be as bad as the site that acquired a very large portion of their reviews and grew during the TER hiatus.

I think you can't have local mods because they could be prosecuted for aiding and abetting a criminal enterprise.  Everything has to be offshore.

probably right. we can do some of it

They may not be local but they'll get familiar with the local scene.

eightmillions8163 reads

They were only monitoring the boards .  

But they could quickly get admin to pull a local review.

eightmillions8135 reads

Simply contact TER , they will take another look at it. If it’s fake , they will pull it quickly.

and, mods had enough clout to get something pulled without litigating. that was the point -- local knowledge, local control. wild (but civilized, sort of) not over-regulated boards. good times.

Please give us information (you can send a message via contact us), explaining why this is a fake review.  If there is information you have and we don't that confirms it is fake, we will pull it.  

Appreciate the offer and your presence in the conversation. All the evidence is anecdotal and hearsay and based on experience (mine and the other reviewers).  The circumstances described don't fit, there are elements missing, and physical components that are wrong.  So I have pretty solid confidence that you will not pull the review.
No point in wasting your time via Contact Us.

Here's my most recent experience of flagging something.  I pointed out to TER Support that a new review was for a provider who had been back home in Russia for almost a year.  Their reply was that they needed the Provider to contact them before they took action, but would flag and monitor in the meantime.  The review is still up. Now it was easy to establish that she hadn't had an ad or been active for over a year. But I had the hardest time looking for her name in the Moscow Yellow Pages.

Pinkbeefflaps163 reads

This is about the most real honest truth you will find here. Everyone that has ounce of common sence , knows Admin propels the Machine of TER.

Have you personally visited the provider in question is Russia? Just because she tells you she is not back does not mean that  she is not back.

We haven't met before. So now we have 2 new friends, you and 8millionwhatever, posting all over the place. Welcome to Minnesota.
 The provider in question worked for an agency -- her entire profile lines up with that agency.  If you attempted to contact her you would get the agency. Certainly she might be here under a different name, but if the suspect reviewer used that contact name and info he uses in the review... he would get the agency.  Finally it was in checking with the agency that I confirmed that her last tour had been more than a year earlier.  Want to have a quick look?  I'll attach the link. Notice that her preceding review was 2 years earlier.  
So TER may be "correct" but they are far from right, or logical, or protective of their reputation, at least in this instance.  
Nice to meet you.
(I should have just said that I saw her in Russia)

-- Modified on 6/13/2020 10:22:09 PM

Register Now!