While I agree that being a "snitch" simply for the sake of being a snitch is typically an almost unforgivable act, if as Catherine says, she was stopping an individual from recruiting underage girls to work for him, then that is an entirely different story.  This is 180 degrees from the poster who compared passing judgment on someone who recruits underage girls to passing judgment on married people engaging in the hobby.  These are two diametrically opposed issues.  If, as Catherine says, she was helping to put away scum such as this individual, then I for one applaud her.  Which one of us would have the kahonies to stand up and do something like that?

I learned long ago to sit back and take a look at the situation someone finds themself in and judge that situation from all angles before passing judgment or typing a quick reply.  Is anyone here actually in favor of underage girls involved in the hobby?????  I believe that LE should not be involved in "policing" any aspect of the hobby other than insuring that underage individuals do not engage in the hobby and that those who are engaged in the hobby are doing so wilingly and not at the command of another.  Given that, if either of those two activities are occurring, not only do I approve of LE involvement to stop those activities, but I encourage their involvement in those aspects.  I would hope that is an issue we can all agree on.