No, I am not a provider.  I'm sure the mod has already checked the IP otherwise my post below would have been taken down.  Yes, I have posted before.  Both here and on the other board, so do your homework. I did submit a review about a month ago, for reasons unknown it never showed, otherwise I would prove my status that way as well.  I did used to post under a different handle, but after this mess I changed all that.  And no, I do not and should not feel obligated to share it with anyone.


The reason I have not said anything in the past is because I do not want any trouble with anyone. I have read posts in the past where a guy will try to post his experience and it was a different experience than the majority.  That person will get slammed on these boards if the girl/agency is popular, no matter if the guy is telling the truth or not.  I am sure I will get slammed on here for saying this, because they have so many loyal supporters, and I see evidence below that people already doubt what I am saying.  But it's supposed to be freedom of speech, right?  Well, I'm choosing to use my freedom of speech now because I feel this is getting out of control and a lot of people look to have clouded glasses on.  


I consider myself lucky that I was out of town the day LE came to my house although it did freak my roommate out. [he got over it] When I got back in town I contacted my attorney and he took care of everything, which was nothing, I never had to talk to anyone else.  The end result was nothing as I had never patronized their service.  I had however, exchanged several emails with the group and made 2 phone calls, the last of which was in October.  That is from my own recollection, nothing that was on record.


It could be the phone calls -- according to MGC it's a myth -- who knows.  It could be they held onto my email address -- but they say they don't keep records -- who knows.  It could be that their computer held onto our email conversations -- but you'd think an agency that was SO into being safe and cautious would have invested in some software to clean their computer -- who knows.  Could be a reason I don't know about -- who knows.


Everyone is entitled to form their own opinion.  That is what freedom of mind is all about and I won't knock any of you for that.  IMHO, I don't think that they are being totally honest with what they are saying now and there are things in the past I don't think they were totally honest with us about either.  No, nothing happened to me as a result, but that has nothing to do with MGC.  It's because I didn't do anything illegal, I am a bachelor, and I have enough brains to have an attorney.  I feel sorry for the guys who do have something to worry about.  

It may just be an issue of timing. Most of my correspondence was via e-mail or chat, and Erica had my business card (all for perfectly legitimate reasons mind you). To my knowledge, nobody has come to see me, or called to ask questions. And I really don't expect them to.

OTOH, if cell phones were confiscated, it may have been that they downloaded phone numbers from the cell phone's memory (some cell phone models retain the last several numbers called and/or received even if deleted) in much the same way that computer files remain on your hard drive even if deleted.

It's hard to say exactly what triggers a visit.

What was their names? Where were they from? They would of left a card. If you never spoke to them how do you know it had anything to do with us? If they wanted to question you they would'nt tell your roommate what about. In one paragraph you have four "it could be's", four "who knows" and one big "I don't know". Then more accusations without explanation.
I would be very intrested if something you wrote made sense, but I dont think this happened at all. All I see is hidden anger and motive. Hide behind this alternate name of yours if you like, Your writing style looks very familiar to me.

Mike

Hey Mike and Task......
Any chance you guys can take this private?  I for one,
have heard more than I need to know.  The whole incident
has made us all more cautious and that is a good thing.
I am sorry for those financially and emotionally scared and wish
it had never happened.

not bother reading them.  

Task had "new" information related to an area where new potential litigation in Ramsay Cty may impact many other people.  Don;t know who contacted him/her nor when nor which investigation this may be related to.  But I would prefer to be forewarned and therefore prepared than to hide my head in the sand.  If you never saw anyone - or contacted anyone from MGC - then again, ignore the thread.  

Mike, on the other hand, brings some very interesting questions to the table that seem to challenge a hidden/unknown poster that he feels may be spreading false information.  Similar to a post from MNhobbyist several months back which also turned out to be somewhat questionable.  

Task may have a valid point.  Difficult to ascertain why his number and address was chosen from what may be hundreds, but if its true then let's see.  Its hard when Task has now created a new identity (not sure why) and prefers to post as a "newbie".  It would be a lot easier to read and understand if his/her old identity was used and would allow for those to apply an appropriate level of credibility to his/her old identity.

Besides, what bandwidth is being stolen out here...  there's really not much else going on....  Let people post what is important to them and pay attention only to what is important to you.

Great days are the norm in my life....

sl

The point is that this is "OLD NEWS" and does nothing for the
enjoyment of the hobby.  In fact, I think enough damage has been done.  Whether I chose to read the post or not doesn't change a
thing.  I am sure Michael would love to see his life return to normal.

Hello,

As someone else pointed out, it is difficult to discern your intentions.  I am not slamming you or defending anyone else, but the information in your posts has not been helpful.  

Is there any way anyone could verify your claims?

Every other instance that I have heard of where clients had contact with LE were because they are caught in or near 'the act' or the client initiated the contact. Why would they choose you to behave so differently?  

I would echo the question:  Who (as in what individual from what branch of LE) contacted you?  Could you scan their card and send it over private email?

"The reason I have not said anything in the past is because I do not want any trouble with anyone."

So you changed your mind because now you *do* want trouble?  This doesn't make any sense.  Why stay silent for so long to avoid trouble, then post information that is unverifiable? - Which is sure to cause trouble.  

Why stir things up now?  What recent development has spurred you to post things to encourage clients to avoid an agency that doesn't exist?

"I am sure I will get slammed on here for saying this, because they have so many loyal supporters, and I see evidence below that people already doubt what I am saying."

I am not slamming you, but as long as you are using the term 'evidence', please, please submit evidence of your claims.

"But it's supposed to be freedom of speech, right?  Well, I'm choosing to use my freedom of speech now because I feel this is getting out of control and a lot of people look to have clouded glasses on."
 
Yes, of course there is freedom of speech, but I notice that the very people who use that phrase are the most suprised when they realize it's a two-way street.  If you think my glasses are 'clouded', then by all means do something to clear them.  

Exactly what do you feel is getting 'out of control'?  Please explain that statement.  MGC has disbanded as a business, they have no clients or escorts.  They only posted here in response to your accusations.  What are your intentions in posting here?  To save us from being clients of an agency that only exists in the past?  

"Everyone is entitled to form their own opinion."

Yes, but you are making claims and accusations in addition to stating an opinion.  There is a difference.  

"IMHO, I don't think that they are being totally honest with what they are saying now and there are things in the past I don't think they were totally honest with us about either."

IMHO, that was more of an accusation than an opinion!  What were they not honest with us about in the past?  What are they being dishonest about now?  Why are you opining about the honesty or dishonesty of a disbanded organization months after it's demise?  

"I feel sorry for the guys who do have something to worry about."

Yet another veiled warning.  If you really 'feel sorry' for clients with something to worry about, why not help them out with some real, verifiable information?  

This was not an attack, these are simply things I am very curious about.

Thanks,

[email protected]

If this is Mo, she is doing pretty good in keeping connected.  Last time I talked to her, (last Monday), she was headed to the north country on a long awaited camping trip.  I'm pretty sure she left Wednesday.  I was hoping she would have taken me with but here I am...........

FYI, I'm not Morgan. Don't go pointing fingers when you don't know where you are pointing them. You people are so predictable, always want to kill the messenger. Hey,you guys asked so I ansered.  Anyone with half a brain woldn't post all that information in a public forum. let alone give it to some guy I don't know from Adam.  Like the man said, let's take this into private. You have my email address.

I'm just messin with ya.  You've got to admit that you sound alot like either Mo or TBD.

It DOES sound a lot like TBD. And a handle with "master" in the title certainly fits TBD's self-image.