It is possible that they actually do prefer to see fewer guys, and are willing to get a little less money in exchange for each guy staying longer. It's also possible they actually do like longer sessions because they like foreplay. (Including conversation, which is itself like sex to women.)

I think a discount on additional hours does demonstrate a real preference.  If the rate increased that would demonstrate a preference for shorter visits.

And if a longer visit equals a lower hourly rate, I might go for it.  But if it's all the same hourly rate then probably just the hour.

The worst is when they mention their preference for longer appointments and then they charge  300/60  500/90  WTF? Why penalize the client for booking more time? I don't get it.

About fact number two...

 Makes sense. I mean, take yoga instructors, painters, musicians and authors. They all love what they do (in theory) and of course they prefer to do what they love for longer rather than shorter periods of time. Thats -only obvious- because, mostly, they charge flat rates for the labor of their craft/art, which compensates an hour of their time. Anything above and beyond an hour is just preformed at no extra compensation -because you know, they do it for the love of it. The ones who prefer to spend less time doing what they love, those are the ones that expect higher compensation for more time invested. .... PUH-LEASE!

 Haha. This logic is simply asinine.
I do like longer dates. I don't see any ol' Joe that reaches out to see me. Screening helps me to try to determine a 'good fit' as well as ensure my safety. I actually enjoy what I do and value the connections I make. And guess what. If I'm investing my genuine passion, efforts and artistic (oh yes, it's an art) abilities at 100% of my capabilities for 3 hours, I will be compensated accordingly. 3 hours is not equivelant to 1, regardless of how you think a woman should charge for something she loves to do/experience.

 But hey, laughing is good. So thanks for the laugh.

 
 Sugar, spice & spunk,

 Alexa :-p

 


-- Modified on 11/29/2016 8:46:10 PM

......indeed, I almost never book a one-hour session.  90-120 minutes are my preferred time frame.  

Heck, 3-4 hours would be my preferred time frame, were it not for that pesky little problem called "I can't afford it!!!"

But, I agree with what seems to be an obvious point: 90 or 120 minutes with the same guy is a LOT less work--in preparation, etc.--than breaking that same period of time into two separate sessions with two different guys...so, for the life of me, I cannot figure why a lady will post something like this:

1.0 hr: 300
1.5 hr: 450
2.0 hr: 600  

I almost never go to a lady with such a price structure.  I WILL go to a lady with something like this:

1.0 hr: 300
1.5 hr: 400
2.0 hr: 500

Don't get me wrong: I also think the longer period of time allows for more time for connection--small talk, flirting, lots more sex play, etc.

But, I can't understand why ladies don't routinely discount--at least a bit--the longer periods of time.  I realize that lots of ladies DO discount like this.  But, I don't understand those ladies who don't.

Am I missing something?

My two cents.

o

Yeah, the joke is really on the fools that enjoy some public time (like at dinner or a show) as a part of the experience and are willing to pay a per hour rate the same or not much less than their one hour private time rates. It's even more hilarious when the playtime for them is less than your one hour visit.  

I used to think treating a lady to a dinner at a nice restaurant OTC would ensure my playtime would be better than if I booked an hour, but it almost never works that way. My last 4 dinner dates (at some pretty nice places) were 1 rounders with ladies known for encouraging multiple pop sessions. It's frustrating to pay 3-4 times their hourly rate and offered half the playtime than your one hour visit.  

You'd think more providers would have better rates for dinner dates when 2 hours is getting paid to eat a nice meal.

There was a girl visiting from Milwaukee this summer that I was so close to seeing. Had an hour date set and everything then she pulled the whole she wants 2 hours instead of 1. Problem with that it was double the price of what was actually expected plus her schedule was pretty wide open, not sure she had much luck coming here if she only allowed multiple hour visits.

...hot and horny and new to the biz, who charged 200/60, 300/90, 350/120.  I thought the pricing structure was genius, and told her so.  No half hours, and a reward for staying for two hours.
The trick was to look at the economics as a per visit (not per hour) deal, and screen with a preference for those who might stay longer.  She almost always got more (often 50% more) than 300 per visit.

I went to see her three times.  Each time I ended up staying longer than intended because it was great value.  So I went in thinking I'd spend about 300 and left having given her significantly more.
It wasn't long before she had people lined up around the block, and she picked and chose; it became hard to get to see her and she became even more desirable.  I booked 10 days in advance!  That's unheard of (almost) for me.

Once she had a few reviews, of course, her price went up to 400/60.
She called me a few weeks ago lamenting that she wasn't getting enough business.  She's out of the game for a few months, but I'll be interested to see what her rates are when she starts up again, if she does.  Looking at pricing on a per visit basis is better economics, and probably better for both parties

Sure as hell going to be kicking your ass out.

When I can afford to hobby 2-3 times per week, and still have money left over, I'll leave the one-hour dates in the dust.

in my experience, extended visits are a better deal.  The second hr is less expensive than the first and the third hr is less expensive than the second.  So, if she was JUST interested in MONEY, she would ONLY do hour visits. KACHINK KACHINK -- More Money honey because no discounted second or third hours.

It's better to establish clientele who like longer visits because:
1. She doesn't have to screen as many guys so less time spent on the business side of the business.
2. Slightly less risk because she is seeing fewer guys
3. some ladies like building a rapport and connection to her clients and that can't be done in a 30-60 min session

I like longer visits!!!!

Getting to know each other is fun!!!  

There are clients you click with that even an hour turn into a multi....

There are times where money is irrelevant.

-- Modified on 11/30/2016 12:56:10 PM

...and so on to reflect that I prefer longer dates.  
About #1 a lot of cum can be produced in longer dates too nudge nudge wink wink.

I always do 90 the first date. And I've done 1 he and long dinner dates.
But yes, some one who simply doubles their hour rate (ex: 1- 300/2-600) reflects to me they don't enjoy longer dates.

Some women know what they are doing, business wise, and it shows!  ;-

Depending on the type of client.  Sometimes we may have shared interests  (traveling,dining, etc) that makes an extended date fun and practical, or it may be that we just have great physical chemistry where 1-2 hrs together makes more sense.