And by good idea I mean something other than carelessness, ignorance, or anything else along those lines.

Strictly therapeutic?  Not sure what site but that happened on BP quite a bit.

I doubt LE would want to do something that would deter a lot of guys from trying to set something up.

Beats anything I've thought about.

Years ago it was common in ads. Such as Lyn and lake etc.Pics would be accurate and rates posted in ads. And they would be legit, and you had very little problems. You could go to certain hotels and ask the0 bartenders if there was any action available and before you knew it a gal would aproach you. Massage parlors girls actually gave you full service upgrades included or rates VIP would always include full service.What happened, the Ratpublican moral majority got involved and people like Gov T Paw started to put pressure on the industry here in Mpls, and started going after Johns and working girls.The laws got stiffer, such as charging girls with trafficing, and confiscating Johns property such as Automobiles while giving prosecurters a share of those profits as incentives.

providers post with location services enabled on their phone and the ad autofill extracts an address. Usually it comes out as a general area, but occasionally as an exact address.  You see this quite frequently on a site like megapersonals. On other occasions I have seen ads that look like someone attacking someone else by impersonating them and posting an address. That used to be more common...

....if not a cop that took over the account it's carelessness and/or desperation and/or false sense of security.
Otherwise I don't recall someone posting an exact hotel or incall address since BP.

Anti-prostitution laws exist because other women insist on keeping it illegal, not because men do.    

There's plenty of hostility towards P4P from both sides of the political spectrum.  FOSTA-SESTA passed with wide support from both sides in Congress

So how do you explain all the ministers, etc from various denominations who are mostly male who lead their congregations in supporting anti-prostitution laws?

I was referring to LPs comment that other women are responsible for anti-prostitution laws.  The religions that are most opposed to prostitution tend to be male dominated.

You have to look at how evolutionary biology influences societies.  Childbearing women have much to lose from promiscuous interlopers who compete for male providers.  In societies where women have more power, promiscuity much less tolerated.

I agree that many women are opposed to prostitution; I just don't agree that women are the principal ones behind anti-prostitution laws as there are an awful lot of men in favor of such laws as well.

It is interesting because Kamala Harris is a major proponent of the fosta sesta bill that was passed and she is super anti prostitution. This was widely talked about on social media today. I know most escorts are mainly democrat and despise Trump but would they vote for someone that would shut down there business? Decisions Decisions!!

Hilarious considering Kamala rose to fame as a sugar babe.

Not that I really think Trump cares but he had no problem signing the bill into law.

Only minor parties support decrim.  I know the Libertarian party supports decrim.  Probably some others.