One man's unattractive is another man's goddess.  If the standard of beauty was universal, the variety of adult sites on the internet would be much more limited.

what i would say is the rating should be at  least close to what other is agree. at least tiffiany/andrea was on the higher class and she has the potential to be that high. With some one that do not has a nice body and beauty get a 8 and above i will not agree on that.
What ever that people want to say now that i know that the review is not reliable here.

I have been reading some of the reviews lately and found that most of the review were overly inflated in score by some reviewer. I am a very picky person when come to the appearance and it is very hard to believe someone will rate a provided that is most classify as 5 beeing a 9.

I found that beth review was especially true as i went to see her and i have to leave  right away because she is definately what other has rate. Some reviewer say she is as high as 9 but with her less than average body and muffin top around the waist, i do not think that will be a model material. We have to be a little more accurate on our review so that other will not waste their time.

As conclusion, either some of these guys has never seen a hot girls or their taste is just beeing low class. In case you do not know what it mean by hot women, go search around and find any one that with over 20 review and get average of 8-9 in rating in appearance.

    You should see Mamma Mia.  A 8 or 9  fur sure!   No Bull.

I think what you really want to say is that YOU should be the sole judge of every provider LOL!!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder man. Rant off.

First review; Tiffany / Andrea

average appearance 8 average performance 7
YOU appearance 10 performance 9

I don't know man...

I second that!
What you think is a 5 could be someone else's 10.

Wth don't you get of how this site operates?

Its not just about YOUR OPINION of who's hot or not.
this isn't theTomTomproviderreview .

Your asking that reviewers rate around the same as the average for that particular provider. Os it not possible for you to have looked at all of the reviews and decided then whether or not to see her?
Did you not bother to look at her pictures?
And you have to keep in mind, like others have said, that beauty is subject to the one viewing it. I may be gorgeous to some and average or not anothers type. Im ok with that.
This just sounds like you are trying to blame that reviewer for your mistake

The same applies to the rest of us.  I've often been puzzled by the scores given to some girls but I see no value in criticizing someone's appearance score when it is such a subjective thing.  The reality is there is always more risk of disappointment in seeing a provider with few reviews because there's not much data.  And in Beth's case, we've known since her first review that the pictures in her ad are not her.

I have to wonder if it's regular clients trying to win favors or inexperienced reviewers. I've seen 6-7's that were rated 8-10's. I'm more likely to trust a reviewer if I agree on their past likes and dislikes. It's easy to be objective on appearance, we know what models look like, performance on the other hand is more subjective.

Hell, some of the ladies have even told me I'm good looking. LOL

in general, "... our eyes tend to enjoy beholding a common aesthetic."  This from the most concise explanation I could find:  http://curiosity.discovery.com/question/what-is-beauty

"The conventional party line is that “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” and while there may be a moralistic truth to this, there’s plenty of evidence that -- whether it’s a Picasso painting or Natalie Portman’s red carpet visage -- our eyes tend to enjoy beholding a common aesthetic. So that, in a way, we’re born with a sense of ideal beauty."

I just saw a gentleman yesterday who swore up and down that I had the most beautiful body he'd ever seen.  I am a BBW guys and I would bet most of you would suggest he visit the eye doctor as soon as possible.    Why don't we all just agree to disagree here and say that Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder ...different strokes for different folks and all that good stuff.  

Who cares as long as we are all having fun?

but obviously we can't just agree to disagree. We would much rather piss and moan about it. That's why.

There are plenty of escorts and celebrities whose looks are generally regarded to be superior but don't do much for me.  IMHO "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" refers to the fact that there is a lot of variation among humans as to what individuals regard as beautiful.  When I'm looking at an escort's pictures (assuming they are accurate), it doesn't matter to me what everyone else has reviewed her appearance as, it matters how attractive I find her.

from what people look like to what people like in people. That means, among other things, that  there is a general consensus about appearance.

I do think it's important to recognize that what we like is much more bulit-in than we are aware of and that most (nearly all) of that relates to perceived fertility.

Different guys pick up on fertility different cues. For some it might be the perfectly symetrical face (perfect genes). For others it's the wide hips (child bearing) or maybe the long legs (signals readiness) or whatever, including cues gathered from cultual and environmental factors. The dozens of cues are well docmented, which includes the fertile appearance of many BBW's, for example.

And coming full circle, almost all of these cues have objective, measurable qualities which we apply consciously or unconsciously. In the end, it's not particularly important, except that some reviews can be particularly inaccurate and unhelpful when the reviewer himself resides near the outside edge of the bell curve.