Very Well stated with regard to future business for the provider minn4evr, and yes you state
that if the activity had been experienced, then the review is appropriate.
I cannot view the actual review, however, What would you consider nice ? Is this meant to cast doubt, or guilt ? upon the reviewer ?
Is your statement, meant to imply that the reviewer should have left that part out ? So as to be Nice ? and thus allow the provider to continue to meet individual fantasies, without anyone the wiser, as to how far she will go ?
TER itself has the marketing slogan, something like " Will She ? " and this is TER, and the reviewer
posted a review, so everyone has an idea, of if She Will ? or YMMV.
It is clearly the choice of present and future clients, as to if they
will seek to continue to do business with a provider.
He clearly stated in subsequent replies in this thread, that he posted an honest review, and now
the cat is out of the bag ? So let the chips fall where they may, At least boomer may decide to
go back and hit it again! If she is open to a repeat ? , and I am sure that there are plenty of others,
who are lurking, and may seek out said provider, and request that very same service that the reviewer received. All the provider has to do, is say Yea, or Nay.
Posted By: minn4evr
Your review strongly implies, without explicitly stating it, that she had sex with you without using a condom (BareBack Full Service). That's a very unsafe practice and many guys have stated many times that they will never see a woman who offers BBFS. If a condom was used, and you just failed to mention it, the "nice" thing would be to say so here, and ask TER to let you revise the review to clarify things.
If you insist it was BBFS, so be it. But don't kid yourself. Your review, if believed, is likely to cost her a good bit of business. And if the claim is true, that would be appropriate. But it's not something most would call "nice."