http://minneapolis.backpage.com/BodyRubs/private-get-away-50-incall-new-customer-special-sensual-vip100-outcall-23/4656037

 

http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=229842

I was told they are not actual providers. If anyone has first hand knowledge please let me know.

Thanks so much,
~Mindy

-- Modified on 9/8/2013 6:42:12 PM

... but most likely not photos of the person who posted the photos.  Some of them appear to be, per Google Image Search, of model Kimbyr Leigha.  I seriously doubt she is now in Minnesota offering sensual massage for $50.  But ya never know...

Thank you SO much! I have someone who claims to have visited this person, I can not get in touch with her for verification & he is using several other questionable gals to verify himself.  
To me this says something about my potential client...ladies beware and the gal named named meela I'm also very curious about please see her website link pages...she is NOT a member of the sites she links to her website.
      Please also know the reviewer that just wrote a review for her, doesn't check out as a guy with normal intentions.  
So again please be careful.  
Thanks for taking your time to read this,
~Mindy

... this is kinda complicated... made more complex because you edited your initial post after I had already submitted my reply above.

First, you provided links to TWO ads.  They do not to my eyes appear to be for the same provider.  The first ad has the same phone number as is in Melisa's TER profile (http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=220613), but that ad doesn't include a name and has pics for a different woman/women than in the ad linked to in Melisa's profile.  And the pics in the BP ad-with-no-name appear to be for other people, as I noted above.  So that's strange, and a red flag... but legitimate providers have been known to put "fake" photos on BP.  And, Melisa has 6 TER reviews.

Then, the 2nd link you provided is for Meela (http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=229842).  The pics in her ad (linked to in her TER profile) appear to be of her, per Google Image Search--or at least, it couldn't find evidence of the photos having been stolen from elsewhere.  And Meela has 3 reviews.  And I don't see anything to raise a red flag on her web site.

So your post is confusing to me... you said "this person", but you gave links to two providers.  You may have good reason to be wary of the client who contacted you, based on your communications with him.  But I don't see how Meela fit into this, or why you are questioning her legitimacy.  (No, I don't know Meela, or Melisa for that matter.)

Wouldn't the safe approach be to ask the prospective client to wait until you have been able to verify his references to your satisfaction?

Oh for sure I have asked him to wait this has been going on for 2weels . Both girls are never available to vouch and the gal named Melisa doing $ 50 incall? Sorry I didn't point out they are two separate gals -but I did the first time..I'm pretty sure when referring to "this person" I'm speaking of potential client -there is just some strange things going on with meela's site and  
The reviews- granted though they exist -the website seems suspect.  I'm not saying for sure ! I'm saying I'm wondering.  
 So why would my potential new friend not mention to me if I try & verify him thru melisa that its not the gal in the BP ad -it's in fact a representation...I posted the links exactly as I was given them, and with all the contradicting things said to me (via potential friend) obviously there's stuff I'm not going to get all into on here.
 I'm just trying to ask around a little if anyone has dealt with either one of these two gals specifically. While I'm also saying  
Ladies be aware & stay safe. Please understand I'm going out of my way to NOT come across accusation-al  but I think it's worth being mentioned in an open forum.
Thanks for your in put BTW the only thing I changed after your replied was changing the words
 " real people" to " actual providers"   your reply still seems to be an accurate one.
Thank again for your time. =)

Wow, and yes, it is always also important to verify the provider, too.   Yikes, I do do this ever time but it get's so tedious at times but this just shows it is so worth it.   I stick with TER well reviewed providers only.  Thank you for sharing!  
 

I'm not sure what ads you're talking about with her.  The ads of her, herself are real and legit pics.  http://minnesota.backpage.com/BodyRubs/busty-sweet-and-sexy-asian-cutie-meela-24/8688532

I can't speak for the latest review or his legitimacy, but it reads as legit.

Finally! Thank you so much for posting!  
I hope your having a great night! =)

Could you be more specific about what you find "strange" and "suspect" about Meela's web site?  FYI, she is using the same "naughtysexy" site that several other local providers use... at least some of whom I know to be 100% legitimate because I've seen them.  I don't see anything strange or suspect about her site.  It looks very much like that of other providers I know who use "naughtysexy".

It's very important to be cautious and play it safe, but IMO before you start tossing out accusations about a provider not being legitimate or having a "suspect" web site, you need to do more research.

And if the references the prospective client gave you can't get back to you within 2 weeks, why not ask the guy for other references?  Or just say, "Sorry, but I don't feel comfortable seeing you at this time."?

It seems complicated- but the bottom line is, if you have to "ask around" if a provider is legitimate and she can't be SIMPLY verified, it is not acceptable as a reference IMO.  

Now, that is MY standard. Different ladies have different ways of operating-- but my bottom line is, a reference is ONLY as good as its source.

If a lady does not have a good handful of reviews by verifiable hobbyists, and is not active on a verification or ad site, or does not have her own site, it's not good enough for me. I would not utilize her as a reference. So if this is all he's got, he may as well not have any because he would need to be screened in another method.  

If screening is going to be like pulling a tooth that doesn't want to come out, I'd pass.

Peace,

Astri

I agree.  
If it doesn't feel/smell right (provider or client) PASS.

Wow -as I as said I'm going out of my way to NOT be accusational at all, and setting up a free escort website is a pretty simple thing to do...I'm not sure if that's the case w/Meelena  
But if your going to push about " why I said" "its a suspect website"  
I believe I already addressed that when I said she has an entire page of links that bring you to other  
verify sites ..yet when you look for her on the sites she links to you can NOT find a profile for her!

 
 Now I feel bad having to repeat this if she is in fact legit, which im told she is. i can only hope she is more understanding as it's clear to me you are misunderstanding me & I get the idea your perception on me is off.
               I -in NO way would ever try & bring anyone down...least of all another gal who is brave enough to be listed on any of these sites. I have the utmost respect for most all people I communicate with, but for every few that I interact with I get some that are way out there & some that may cause me worry. I was looking for positive assurance from anyone who may know these gals first hand and if I'm being misunderstood I'm going to mention it.
        Now I would love to not discuss it any further & of course I have taken the advice of so many of you on here. Thanks to all of those who understand. =)
Keep smiling,  
~M

i've had at least one provider inform me, when i mentioned her naughtysexy website, that she had nothing to do with it--the site had just created the site without her knowledge or permission.  (at least the info they'd put on the site was correct, and not misleading)

They won't take it down or give me the password to control it, so it lives on the Internet forever, I guess.  

I wish I could make it go away--I would never design a website that ugly!

utilitarian, minimalistic site without many, if any, redeeming qualities.

Since that site is so insidious, I wonder why a provider would choose to have it in her TER profile?  I know several providers who have it in their profiles.  Odd...

-- Modified on 9/9/2013 5:54:03 PM

some reviewer, maybe the intial reviewer, will add it to the profile as part of the review, and, shall we say, TER admin is not ALWAYS responsive to provider requests when it comes to altering details of profiles.

Grids, white space, and clean lines? Yes, please!

The use of Brush Script? I would prefer not to.

This happened to me and another provider I share a studio with:-/