May I quote you?
"More time on TER and less time on Twitter seems like a nightmare, considering the way some of these posters speak about the women that they’ve seen/are seeing/plan to see."
Seems that right there is one source of information that you have access to that will assist you in determining if a potential client is reputable enough for your satisfaction. That is, if you have looked up potential clients history, and don't just dislike TER due to word of mouth from other providers who don't like it.
Please bear in mind, I'm not defending TER, or any posters on here. There's a lot of toxicity that isn't really necessary and it has always be present here to some extent. Before Sesta/Fosta this website was much more interactive and a lot of providers contributed quite often. The newer generation of women who hate on it probably never see it as a useful tool.
Hank mentions a couple of sources of information, My most preferred method personally is P411, of all the places out there I rate it the highest.
What could be a more useful tool to determine if a potential client is reputable enough to be seen that actual commentary from fellow providers? One thing that has always boggled my mind is screening methods that insist on real world information from potential client and do not accept references. How is a partially covered ID and something like a Linked account going to be able to convey to a provider things like punctuality? Hygiene? Attitude (whether poor or congenial)? even something as simple as bad breath?
As I mentioned earlier, I am not aware of your screening methods, and don't mean to impugn them in any manner, I believe it is every sex workers right to establish whatever level of security and comfort that works for them, that last paragraph is simply a general comment about something that quite frankly mystifies me.
I hope I provided some useful information in these communications with you, As Ms. Savage, who commented earlier, could tell you this subject comes up often, and I wanted to provide you with some alternative viewpoints.
I personally believe there has been a generation of newer mongers since Sesta/Fosta, who have no idea things like TER exist, are ignorant, and are willing to do to whatever the newer, disconnected from TER generation, providers want, and have no idea how they are exposing themselves, or making what others would consider a bad decision.
I will give you an example without naming any names, There is a provider visiting the Twin Cities and has an add up on the same website that you post ads on. There are a few threads in the general comment sections that talk about her, how she has used client information for attempted extortion, attempted to financially defraud clients, and has even exposed other providers.
Her ads screening requirements ask for (among other things) the following:
Name
Phone #
Provider References
Employment info
Whereas the older, experienced ones, like myself, who do know that there are methods that have always worked, without deposits, or real world information requirements (again, not that you yourself ask that, as I stated I do not know your screening methods) will move on after seeing those requirements.
Consider newer guy who is being conditioned to the standards that the Twitter crowd demands. Deposits, Real world information, etc. He see's said ad, she is an attractive women, and pulls the trigger, only to have a lot of bad things happen to him.
Please keep that in mind when discussions like this come up on here, Yes, there are a lot jerks, but there is also a large group of us here who are experienced, and careful, because we learned to be that way. And many of us would actually be ideal clients that you would wish to have as a regular, or even as semi regulars, who won't break the rules as we know them.
May I propose a thought experiment?
How do you/we overcome the gap between what you believe should be mandatory for your satisfaction and/or convenience and the many potential clients out there, many of which would be clients you wished to have as regulars, that believe that is quite frankly too much?
As I said, a thought exercise, I'm not asking for any exceptions, feel free to set your own requirements as you see fit, and I do wish you good fortune and safe travels.