Minnesota

good judgment
Apollo-x 1247 reads
posted
1 / 6

that out hobbyists or providers. Folks, this should be a no brainer.

You will get moderated, or worse!

philogyny 842 reads
posted
2 / 6

I think that someone posting links to one of the articles with a name may have been confused by observing similar instances in the past.

There has appeared to have been some confusion about this policy on this board in the past.

vorlon 119 Reviews 1813 reads
posted
3 / 6

You bring up a good point.  I thought the rule was we were not supposed to link to articles that would allow the reader to connect someone's escort or hobby "name" with their real name.  I did not see the original link so I don't know what was in it but the ones I have seen did not have that kind of information.  

Moderators, would you please clarify this?

Apollo-x 538 reads
posted
4 / 6

Vorlon, the article in question had the hobbyist's real name, work info and a photo.
I can't think of any circumstance that such an article should be posted here.

I think we should err on the side of discretion.  

Schmohawk 59 Reviews 938 reads
posted
5 / 6

I think that the media loves to make a big deal about stings and bust, especially when they can refer back to politicians and celebrities who have been caught up in similar situations.

Rule of thumb: NO NAMES.

If an article has names, pictures or personal info then do no post a link to it.


We are all on the same side her, we would expect the same for ourselves.

vorlon 119 Reviews 1408 reads
posted
6 / 6
Register Now!