OK so maybe a little toooo bored today so I thought I would see what the list of the top gals in the Twin Cities looks like from the beinging of 2005... This list is for all TC gals that are above an 8 in looks and and 8 or better in performance... Just seems to me a very short list for such a big metro area??..

3/24/2006....Mandy and Shelly..9.5
4/14/2006....Lylah.............9.11
3/6/2006.....Tuzdae & Mandy....9
4/5/2006.....Team Angel........9
12/17/2005...Bianca James and Tuzdae  9
2/8/2006.....Bianca and Kali...9
4/2/2006.....Holly.............8.9
3/29/2005....Catherine Spiga...8.78
5/22/2005....D.................8.75
7/11/2005....Taylor............8.64
7/7/2005.....Roxanne...........8.53
4/19/2006....Tuzdae............8.43
11/17/2003...Tara..............8.33
4/24/2006....Kristian..........8.33
2/17/2006....Bianca James......8.33
4/19/2006....Alana.............8.33
1/14/2005....May...............8.25
11/30/2005...Amber.............8.25
4/21/2006....Sweet April.......8.24
3/1/2006.....Katie Monroe......8.15
3/24/2005....Vanessa...........8
2/17/2006....Shari.............8
9/9/2005.....Sasha.............8
8/28/2005....Neena/Brazil......8
4/25/2006....Lady Corazon......8
1/8/2006.....Kimberly Love and Jenna Devine 8
9/2/2005.....Kali and Bianca...8
4/5/2006.....Kali..............8
11/20/2005...Charlie...........8
2/26/2006....Cassie............8
4/11/2006....Amber.............8
12/4/2005....Alley.............8


-- Modified on 4/26/2006 8:38:44 AM

That is a relatively short list considering that a number for ladies are on the list more than once ( ie with multiple partners ) and that a number of them are also out of the biz to the best of my knolledge.  It would be fun to compare this list to say one for Dallas or Houston Texas.

Also on your list did you select that multiple reviews are required? A couple of these I suspect may be a single hit wonder.

Papastevie

I would think you are not too bored or you would have extrapolated a score based on how many reviews and rates per review.

something like: 100* ( SQRT(LN(number of reviews)) + LN(review rate + 1) ) * [1 - (Days since last review / 100)]

LN = natural log
SQRT = square root

Just a thought.

No I did not do the multiple reviews... missed that one... Yes once you consider the tag teams and the retared gals and the ones that just won't answer the phone the list gets really small.. OK did a quick look at Phoenix and noticed that they had nearly 100 gals with a rating of 9 or better... maybe not the city to compare the TC to but just makes one think... Bring on that Arizon heat!!

I think Britney should be on that list also.

First off this is NOT sour grapes from me, I really don’t have any issues with your observations, just some of your findings.  Have you thought about that the guys in Phoenix just rate the women higher than the guys in the Twin Cities? And there are just more Phoenix reviews to compare to. If you view new reviews for Phoenix and the Twin Cities, Phoenix has 91 new reviews, where the Twin Cites has 59.  There are simply more reviews posted in Phoenix than in the Twin Cities.  In fact, doing a search for both areas with out any criteria set, Phoenix has 520 reviews and the Twin Cities has 326. In other words guys,  you need to post more reviews to fairly compare, and I too have too much time on my hands.

I will agree with you that Phoenix maybe is not a fair example to compare the Twin Cities to... Granted it is a hot spot for the hobby!
We have seen a number of ladies come up from Phoenix and I can only compare my experiences with that. From my observations of the how the guys in Phoenix do their reviews, I would have to say they do not over rate. Their expectations seem to be very high for what one gets in a session. It just is simply fact that there are more women in AZ that provide a higher level of service.  
Now what I wonder is the level of service any correlation to the rate paid? Or is it just a condition of what the local market is willing to offer… makes one think?
I will say there are some incredible women here in the Twin Cities and I am very glad I have had the opportunity to meet some of the best the TC has to offer and I still am always looking for that Total GFE and they just seem hard to find out there. I do want to say I would rather support the locals but it has been hard for me…I have played the field from the $1/2 to the $$$$$ level and have experienced everything from uninspiring to incredible, sometimes it seems that you do get what you pay for. But how does one compare someone that provides a very limited experience to one that provides an outstanding level for the same price? Why would I pay a higher price for services that are not of equal value or pay the same price for less of an experience… Just my .02 worth

Oh sure I'm sure uptight Hank will just be thrilled to see his georgescore formula being used to rate escorts!

Iowa, or even Kansas City, which doesn't even appear in TER

yes its definatly diff out here than phx. guys out there are not so harsh on reveiws and don't expect so much for a small amount of money. they will pay 400 all day long and do it with a smile. yes definatly out 2 push the envelope so watch out twin cities.

I really don't consider $$$ to $$$.50 as a small amount of money! And now you want more then what the local market average is?? This just doesn't make sense to me...Call_Me_Crazy…LOL!!  If you want!!.. Maybe I am missing something here but without having the proven track record or the credibility as an outstanding agency I can not… nor will I support that kind of rate increase.. I guess my envelope will be empty... I have to side with the guys on this one…