Flying in to LA for business tomorrow and staying until Friday. Looking for a LA's finest to entertain and dine with.

Will be free every evening after 6pm while I am staying. Please message me if you are game.  

Cheers.

I wish you luck, and hope you can find a lady with whom you can have a fun time, and to whom you can give a more complimentary review... otherwise it appears you can't be satisfied, and no provider wants to take that chance.

Sounds like you might remain that way, too.

Hey Ladies,

I do apologize for my old reviews. I was younger and a different person. We all grow and make mistakes.

Hopefully I can prove to a special provider that I have changed. Just looking to have a good time in LA!  

Cheers

That seems a little harsh for the dude.  His first two reviews were consistent with the comments made by other hobbyists who had seen the ladies, no better and no worse.  His fourth review was very flattering but I guess he made the mistake of not inflating the grades and hanging a "gold medal" around the lady's neck as he gave scores of 7/7.  I tire of seeing all of the 10s from hobbyists who have seen 20 plus women all of whom are "one in a lifetime".  How many lifetimes do these dudes get?  Thank you for the honesty Ivory69.

a changed person, why don't you have some more recent reviews that would reflect that fact?  Don't blame the ladies for wanting to have nothing to do with you.

poster who uses an alias, we can't really judge the credibility of your post because we can't see your reviews.  Maybe you give inflated reviews and just like talking out of both sides of your mouth, or maybe you give "honest" reviews of the kind you're praising here.  We don't really know, so without any kind of credible context, you are just taking up space on this thread.

A couple of his reviews are FBSM which can only rate a 7, and he gives 5s which isn't bad.  There was a time when a lady appreciated being called attractive.  Now I guess it must mean something else, eh?   His reviews seem consistent with other reviews of the ladies.  Why go after him like he's poison?  Why not take it as a challenge to rock his world?  Plus you get paid, win lose or draw.  Sometimes people are just plain confusing to me.

A person's reviews need to be looked at w.r.t how others rate the lady.  Also, reviews for FBSM and S&M can't go real high on performance and if I guy tired they would be rejected.  For me I try and be very consistent.  It is quite rare for me to give a 10.  So if I give a 10 guys can rest assured that I felt it was quite mind blowing.  As long as it is a good complete menu done well it is rather easy to get an 8 or 9 from me.  Once I get to the 6 or lower range on performance I felt there were issues in the quality of the session, bad attitude, distant, misrepresentation of services, etc.  With misrepresentation of services I could go with anything from a 6 to a 2.  A 6 would be if it is minor or I suspected there were mitigating issues like her not feeling well.  A 2 would be if I felt it was clear deliberate bullshit misrepresentation of services to screw guys over.  

Sadly I had to dish out my first ever 2 back in December and I'm floored that other guys will continue giving her 6's and even an 8 on performance when in their own reviews they support my very complaints of bullshit misrepresentation!  The only way ladies like that will stop misrepresenting themselves is if it is reflected in their performance ratings.  

But if a lady gives me a good GFE experience that reflects how she represents herself in her profiles it's probably going definitely going to be an 8 or 9.  Sometimes it is very hard for me to decide between an 8 or 9.  I reviewed one recently where I went back and forth in my head for some time.  Everything was great except she was not very into kissing because she felt she would catch more colds that way.  So it was hard for me to consider it a real GFE without that, so 8 it was.  But my review clearly stated it was a very strong 8.  That was one of those occasions where I wish I could have given an 8.8 or something similar.

-- Modified on 2/16/2016 11:32:01 PM

You are reading into my comments a whole lot of stuff that simply isn't there.  In no way does my saying you get paid by seeing this guy implies I don't think you are a human being.  I'm not even sure I understand the nexus there.   What it does imply is that you are a businessperson and business opportunities are what you make of them.  You begrudge him for bad reviews and don't want to risk your future business by seeing him.   My point was why not view it as a challenge to rock his world.  Think of what it would mean to your future business if you were this guys first 9/9 or dare I say it, 10/10 review.  That's all I meant.  

There is also the risk that vilifying this guy will simply drive him to not use his TER information at all for screening. At least here he's being honest and up front.  You certainly have the right to see or not see whoever you choose.  But making it more difficult in the process seems counter-productive.

+1 cdl. May be a perfectly credible gent, but who knows? Why the mystery and need to hide with a post that is relatively benign IMHO?

I took a closer look at your reviews.  For your last review in September 2014, based on your description of the session I think I would have rated it a 9 on performance.  Also, based on her photos she looks like a 9 in the looks department.  

For your first September 2014 review I’m not sure what to think.  She seems to offer a complete menu and you made no mention of her misrepresenting services or doing anything wrong.  So I would have to think the other reviews where right that she probably should have gotten an 8 on performance.  With looks I can’t tell since she does not have an active link.  However, your rating on looks is also outside the norm for her.  

Your April 2013 review was massage only and in that case you are in the ballpark with other reviewers.  I see nothing wrong here.  

Your February 2011 review was another massage review and your rating was also in the typical range for that lady.  In fact, you rated her better than a lot of guys did.  I see nothing wrong here either.  

Where the issue came from was clearly your two 2014 reviews.  I don’t know how many providers you have actually seen.  If you have seen quite a few and they all preformed as your two in 2014 did, I guess I could understand how it would be average for you.  However, you need to be careful about that.  When I see a provider I try not to compare her against other providers because if I did and they were all excellent then they would be the average.  Instead I look at it as a standalone event against a standard scale.  What could have been better?  Did she do anything wrong?  Was hygiene good or a bit lacking?  If everything is good then the session should be rated that way.  It’s similar to grading on a standard scale vs. grading on a bell curve.  It is hard to be fair if grading on the bell curve if you are only seeing really good providers.  The rating “forgot it was a service” is a good GFE session just as good or better than having sex with a horny new girlfriend.  If all your sessions are that way you have luck.  But that does not mean they should be rated more average, they still gave a “forgot it was a service” experience.

I really like the fact you seemed to be trying to give honest reviews.  The problem seems to be in your grading scale.  One of the things that really bugs me is when guys are a bunch of Pansy kiss asses with no balls that give good ratings to providers who clearly don’t deserve it.  So I appreciate the fact you were trying to be honest.  It appears to me that you simply need to stop using a scale like a bell curve and switch to something more like a standard scale.   I get a real kick out of it when a provider gives a guy a really bad session and then threatens to black list the guy if he writes a bad review, then the guy not only writes the bad review, but also details the threats.  I just want to take that guy out and buy him a lobster dinner.  

There is nothing wrong with writing a bad review if it is justified.  In fact, it can serve as a warning to providers who misrepresent themselves and pull other bullshit to not book with you.  You can save yourself from bad experiences that way.  But at the same time, if you see a provider who provides complete good service with a complete menu, and you can’t think of anything that should have been better that should be an 8 on performance at the minimum, in my opinion

Cant believe where this thread ended up.  I know its a social forum but damn I never had so many responses before hating on me.  So sorry you all dislike my reviews.  Don't see the point in reviews if we all just gonna lie and say it was great when its not.  

Been having a wonderful time in LA regardless of you haters. Like someone said above,  easy for me to exclude TER from screening.  Crazy you all thought I would be all alone in LA.  You all are not friendly but luckily my LA real life experience is super friendly... super hot...  

Cheers

were able to find a little fun in spite of the baggage you brought in the form of your reviews.  You must have handled it correctly.

You need not regard constructive criticism and advice from veteran hobbyists that are an integral part of the LA community as "haters."  The posters here are mostly helpful but we all like to joke around a little, so sort it out, take away the good advice, and ignore what you don't like.  

We will all look forward to your reviews of the girls you saw while you were in our fair city.  Can't wait to see how you're changed.  

-- Modified on 2/18/2016 2:01:21 PM

His metrics are skewed to the low side as his Looks Value of 7 for Brooklyn Heart provide evidence.  If I were I provider and I saw his reviews with those low numbers I would steer clear of him as a client.  I wouldn't even give it a second thought nor a second chance.  But that's just me.

As well, his Looks and Performance Values are inconsistent with his review.  Somewhere in there there is a disconnect and a motive, yet to be revealed.  Just sayin'