So I read a review and immediately get a sense of deja vu all over again.  The style of the writin - almost no punctuation, the syntax, the use of present tense, the vocabulary - reminds me of another review, but dang, I can't find it.  Anyway, the reviewer is a first timer, it's the first review for the girl, and a good one, but the reviewer says its the best service he's ever had.  Dunno, but it smells funny to me.....

from the style, broken English, punctuation, etc... bogus!

It could be the booker/agent writing the review for her.  But yes, I agree it's a bogus one.

Who knows if review is fake but booker is reliable and 8 rated girl is the worst i have ever experienced with this booker.

Why is Chicken nugget using an alias for defending it?

Very possible but, let's not go overboard to the point of hurting this gal's chances to attract clients. By the way, how do any of us explain the great disparity in reviews? One guy will give a gal a 10 and the next reviewer gives her a 7. Let's just wait a bit on this one. Ciao!

Wait for some more reviews and see who's doing the reviewing.
I never make a decision based on one.

...especially because there was another review very similar in syntax, grammar, style, and it, too, was a first time reviewer of a first time reviewee....   I just think something is rotten...or at least overripe...in the state of Denmark.....

But, as yoiu say, MuffTime, we need to wait either way...

RT

I read the second review of Rebeda and it sounded just like her roommate Ciara.  I saw Ciara and she was terrible but her two other reviews were very good.  

Ciara does not have a nice round ass one of the reviewers commentsd at least not the Ciara I saw.  I think that I saw the same girl Alanfprince saw as Rebeka.

Maybe the roommate are trading off.  If so Rebeka is getting the short end.....maybe.

Very confusing.

L6

http://asianescortla.com/