What's with all the tats on girls these days?   Do any of you guys find these sexy at all?  I've never found them flattering on a woman.  It really effects me on who I want to see.

Does anyone else feel the same?

Who out there likes them - and please fill me in on the attraction (other than you like the artwork).  I'm really curious about what others think.

I'm seeing more and more pics of providers with these large things on them or all over them and on civilian women too.  

...Of course, it was a while ago since the equipment in the tat is no longer needed.

as long as she's not completely covered.
And as long as there aren't any facial or leg tattoos.

I have tatts & I consider all of mind classy artwork, so te each their own.  Realistically, if the tattoed providers offer top notch service, than you maybe missing out on having a blast.  Based on your reviews it obviousy, your very judgemental.  Regarless, of your 1 reputable rovider whitelist some providers may pass on seeing you.  Again, to each their own.  I had a poor review in the past stating the clients was upset because of my tattoos & I kept it up because that is his personal opinion.  If you do not, like tattoos do not bother contacting me!  I am pierced all over too!  lol Not everyone see's beauty the same.  I find confidence to be attractive regardless of what you may, or may not have been naturally blessed with.

you know what she did to get that tattoo

Like most things it's a personal choice. Check out Krista Starr from Phoenix - I mean -  COME ON!  tell me she's not stunning.

Its funny now that a woman with no ink and no piercings is pretty rare - and as a result - somewhat beautiful.

The rule was always - no tattoo larger than an erect penus lol

if her initial CV ad showed her her tattoos. But I am glad I did , she was not the tallest or most beautiful ( in her second tour she created her own original  jet black cropped hair punkish/Gothic look ) but nobody could match her for performance, she was from a different planet.

Although some of my Favorite K-dolls Sasha, Lime , Vivian & Hara have tattoos and K-Diva Lohan has a fading birth sign I would rather a body art and piercing free body.  

It is a turn off to see a great body covered to trashy tattoos. Definitely a generational with some and upbringing difference with others.

I love em and compare them to mine!

About six months ago, I went to a strip club for the first time in five or six years. Well, first time since I discovered TER.

I could not believe the coverage on the girls. It was hard to find patches of skin that were not inked up.

But most of the customers had just as many. I and one other business traveler were the only ones without ink showing. He was sitting alone nursing a beer as was I. Leaving, he caught my eye and he just shook his head in disbelief. I didn't get one table dance the whole night and I haven't gone back since.

Maybe I was in the wrong club? Or has the world gone thru a fundamental shift?

.....I think the gals should be up front that they have them. Too many providers in their ads, City Vibe and otherwise, have not just blurred out their tattoos, rather they've photo-shopped them out in such a way that it appears none exist. I certainly understand the need to protect one's identity, but let's not create false illusions.

When I first got into the business in 1986, it was a real rare thing for a girl in the business to have a tattoo.  There was one girl in the business named Viper that had huge tattoos all over her body, but she was the exception to the rule.

Also, back then, a lot of the strip clubs wouldn't hire girls if they had tattoos.  

But somewhere along the way, tattoos stopped being perceived as low class and trashy and started being perceived as body art.  And even beautiful, classy woman began getting tattoos too.  And just as porn has become mainstream, tattoos have become mainstream.

I still have a personal preference for non-tattooed women and I'm not too crazy about tattoos on a man either, but so many of them have them.

When my ex-husband wanted to get tattoos we had to go a few rounds before I finally was agreeable to them.  Of course, he could have gotten them without my blessing, but I gave him a bit of grief before I realized that he should be able to do what he wanted with his body.  He got one on each arm, which wasn't so bad, but I was never one of those girls that liked those bad boy rocker types with tattoos all over their body.

Tattoos are very in vogue now.  But I will continue to keep my canvas clean.

Lots of Lust,
Keisha

Have to agree with Shelby on this one. A bad haircut will grow out. That hideous perm you used to sport will eventually be forgotten. Even your 1970s-era leisure suit can be dismissed as a bad fashion trend. But tattoos are permanent, unless you want to go through the lengthy and painful laser removal process. That's not for me.

I prefer my gals to be tatt-free but I don't mind if a girl has a few. I've seen a few girls with sleeves, the obligatory "lower back" tatt, nape of the neck, on the ankles or the thigh. I'm quirky about girls that have them on their breasts or stomach...kinda distracts from the view for me lol. I like that area to be devoid of ink personally.

In an ideal world, I prefer no tatts. But then some of my favorite ladies have them, and I can't say they diminish the experience at all. In fact, you could say those ladies are a bit more fun and adventurous -- perhaps the personality type that is more likely to have one or more tattoos.

Some comedian once said this and I think, in a lot of cases, it's true:

"I like a girl with tattoos -- because it means she's willing to do things that she will regret later!"  

I always prefer a woman with no tattoos whether civvie dating or in hobbying  But, if a woman has ink it won't put me off from seeing her.  To me, a woman who is physically attractive and sexy is still attractive and sexy with tattoos, just in a different way.  And, it does have an appeal to me, but it is not something that I would seek out, because it's not important to me.

I did see one provider who has a fair amount of ink, but in her photos she has all of it removed via photo editing.  This is indeed misleading.  I asked her about that and she said to me that no one has ever left upon seeing her tattoos.  She's incredibly hot. I have seen ads with some women who show their tattoos whether blurred or not and it doesn't put me off from wanting to see them.

I'm fine with providers who have them or choose not to.  I have to say that tattoos can be very erotic and artistic.  But frankly I do my due diligence based on the  whole person, tattoos being a small factor either way.

(sigh)  I am not judgmental.  And no, providers don't pass on seeing me.

"Brands Belong on Cattle, and that ain't what we're sellin' at Miss Mona's"
--The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas

All kidding aside, for me, it depends on a number of things:

1) The kind of tattoo. I know most tattoos are images that have a special meaning to the bearer, but I have seen things that really break the erotic mood: I don't want to be staring into Tweety Bird's eyes or wondering if the blaster on your Boba Fett is accurate. And when some folks have what looks like the enitire Magna Carta written in "Ye Olde English" font on their back, I find myself thinking, "hold still, I'm trying to read the second paragraph!" Essentially, it can distract or detract from the mood--and it's doubly surprising when someone's pics in their ad have been photoshopped and you discover a beautiful bare back is actually emblazoned with a full-on Mayan calendar, and now I'm thinking about the end of the world. Buzzkill.

I have a friend who had a double mastectomy and has an awesome intricate tattoo on her chest (which she designed) to cover her scars. She's one of the sexiest women I know, with or without her tattoos, but at least she chose an image that is beautiful, feminine and not a mob scene of all her favorite Looney Tune characters.

2) Placement. Females have been adorning their bodies for centuries--nothing new here--and artists have been inspired by the natural beauty of women's bodies for probably just as long. But there are parts of the female form that are so beautiful & sexy in the natural state, I don't care how great the art is, it's a shame to cover up such perfection. Who is the clown that popularized the lower back tattoo?? 'Fess up! That's one of the worst ideas EVER. Good lord, men have been trying to get women to UNdress for ages, and you're inventing ways to permanently cover some of the most sensual and sexy curves on her body?! Stop the madness!

But, hey, that's just me. Tattoos are something that are very fashionable right now, and, like everything else, at some point a younger generation will come along and say "Tattoos? No way! Those are for old people--like my parents!"

...I know not everyone else loves tattoos, so I made sure to add a disclaimer TWICE to my website. I have tattoos on my arms that were done by world renown artists and were featured in several tattoo magazines...I'm proud of them. They do not take over my appearance whatsoever, in fact, people hardly notice them after first glance-- my tattoos are definitely not my centerpiece. Also, my style is more trendy rather than grunge/punk/rock (which tattoos are usually associated with), so altogether, I'm just one fantastic work of art.