First off I go covered! And, there is still a risk! All anyone can do is is make the best choice for themselves and once again there is a risk! This is a risky business from a lot of different angles! As for pressure to lower prices, I only see them going up! As far as speaking out, what is the end game? For all providers to go CFS and all clients to go covered? Money drives this business and money will dictate how it is run! Pleasure drives the clients and the little head almost always wins out!
I am distressed that so many k-girls have opted for bbfs. How stupid is that? What's worse, from reading the reviews, apparently some don't post the option in their ad, but do it anyway, even cip. Who wants to be the one to DATY after her last client? Given the risk, isn't this behavior just asking for LE to get involved?
Yes I know that bbbj is also risky, but still, why compound the risk, not to mention the gross factor? I am so put off by this I am not inclined to see k-girls anymore. If any providers are reading this, I would imagine there are many out there like me, and they should advertise that bbfs is not an option.
i recently read a review where the reviewer stated he did bb anal and went back and forth between anal & pussy bare back. bareback anal used to be called suicide
the bbbj started in california and expanded so now its bbfs starting in california
What happens when a girl contracts a STD, and for the guys what would you do if you caught something?
For the girls/agency's, do they have a doctor "Feelgood" on retainer who checks them out every so often? Is there a "go to" doctor? If no, do they self inject with penicillin every so often, just to make sure.
And here's the kicker, if a girl contract STD and passes it along, will she notify her recent customer, the ones who went bare? My guess on that is, no...it'll be filed under the cost of doing business.
look BBFS has been going on forever .. and i am glad its at least being talked about out in the open. my own observation is that it is going on more with the traditional indy non asian ladies than in the past. why one can only speculate.
but if i had to make a choice i would chose a somewhat selective moderate volume indy girl who primarily goes BB with regulars vs a KGIrl seeing 6 guys a day and going BB with nearly all .
of course without sounding financially prejudice, i would hope a guy who can pay $700 is more selective and overall more health conscious than a guy paying $200
yes i am also seeing TER ladies now posting NO BBFS on their websites. sad they have to do that but good idea.
as for guys who have seen 50 + KGirls and nearly BBFS with them all and claim they are still clean . well certainly glad BUT reminds me of the guy who jumped off the building and as he passed the 5th floor yelled " so far so good !"
Yes, I agree bbfs with kgirls has been around for along time! It was hush hush and "guys" would be respectful about it and not blast it on boards.
It was never allowed on open boards even TER back in the day would not post and you would get the inbox message.
To re-write your post and delete bare services. But, the last few years seems TER allows it.
Other board that starts with a US has openly allowed it so it's a norm now.
Just wondering if you guys participate in P2P slide? If so, do you cover for that? As far as DATY, it is a low risk, but still a risk! I would guess going covered with a provider that offers BBFS is also a risk! Providers will do what they feel is best for them and it's all about the money! This business has all kind of risks. All you can do is make the best choice for yourself!
There is no other answer to this question. You play the game, you take the risk. Every once in a while, you might take a real bad hit and you'll have to deal with it.
Even with girls who advertise "no bbfs," what are the chances they still do it with select clients, boyfriends, husbands, etc? Pretty high.
It's not a kgirl issue. It's a hobby issue.
Let’s cut to the chase. If you’re going to judge bbfs, than what’s stopping you from judging the illicit act of prostitution itself, including your own complicity?
....if the guys who say they got BBFS really did? I would think usually someone would have to know the lady rather well before BBFS would be any possibility. In those cases where it does happen, I would think the guy would have enough brain cells to know not to talk about it. Makes me wonder if those who brag about it are just blowing how air out of their asses?
Now you have K-Girls openly advertising BBFS for a up-charge so the days where, "I like you, you like me" are kinda over. You don't have to have history with her, just an extra 100 and you're good. And the reviewer are more cavalier about it, they don't have that code of hush, hush when it comes to reviews. Now they feel that I paid for it, I'm not the only one so fuck it.
So I don't think there's a air of braggadocios... after all they paid for it.
i just don't get some guys who have gone BBFS with over 30 different KGirls , knowing each of those girls has had over 100 BB guys themselves .. the math is in escapable that one day something will .............. happen.
a while back i wound up going BB with the only Kgirl i had seen in years and i couldnt sleep for a month and just sweating the whole time til i got tested .. certainly not worth it !!
Perhaps these girls who are offering BBFS (it's become so prevalent there is probably pressure to offer it), are on PrEP and /or constant low doses of antibiotics, which would lower the risk or catching and spreading. It would be nice to hear from some bookers/providers on this. If not, there should be an increase throughout the escort community of HIV/STD's over the next 6 months to year. Makes me want to avoid the whole scene for now.
...but do you really expect that to happen? Have K-girls and/or their bookers ever posted about anything on TER?
Not that I've seen.
I saw a busty K Girl for the second time this past wknd and BBFS was offered for an extra $40 and no test was required. That's crazy. They should be charging double for that and the guy should be required to show a full-panel test.
And no, I didn't go BB. Tempting, but no way would I do that with any gal who openly offers it. There was another K Girl in Vegas who offered the same deal. Not long after I saw her (for a covered session) her profile was deleted off TER. I found that suspicious. My gut tells me something happened.
The upcharge is too nominal for the huge risk. My best guess is that there are HI VOLUME hobbyists that visit so often they drive the price down. You know, the type that are obsessed and visit K-Girls multiple times per week. They play one K-Girl against the other to pressure the price lower. I've noticed that some of them have stopped reporting all of their condom-less sessions on TER as more hobbyists have stopped turning a blind eye and have started speaking out.
First off I go covered! And, there is still a risk! All anyone can do is is make the best choice for themselves and once again there is a risk! This is a risky business from a lot of different angles! As for pressure to lower prices, I only see them going up! As far as speaking out, what is the end game? For all providers to go CFS and all clients to go covered? Money drives this business and money will dictate how it is run! Pleasure drives the clients and the little head almost always wins out!
I think of it this way, some of us have, at certain points in the past had unprotected sex with (non escort) women we met in clubs, parties, etc. Of course with providers, the difference is she has had literally hundreds of BBFS encounters, as opposed to those women we met at parties and banged who had maybe been with 50 dudes and given them bbfs. Not sure if it's a big difference. Bottom line, use a condom and you're probably safe but there's still the risk of HPV and other STDs.
I have even noticed a few BBFS reviewers who also have seen TS's. Which means there are guys who one day receive anal sex and take jizz loads from TS / Gay providers and then the next day go and BBFS a Kgirl. Fuck that.