Anyone should be able to post honest reviews without fear of receiving negative comments or any kind of backlash.  

I have never seen this girl (I prefer K-land), however, having just read your review it's like you're lashing out at the other reviewers that you appear to think have done you a dis-service by rating her highly. This poor girl got caught in a the crossfire.

It's unlikely people will really take notice of your review as it is a clear anomaly.

What I will say is that I do agree with you, just from her website pics, that she is not stunning. But that is looks only and there is way more to a woman than that.

Hopefully somebody will use you as a toy like you used this person and you will know what it feels like.

perhaps relating to women. huts over 10 days ago you had the audacity to refer to the K-doll as McDonalds ( see below) very classy thing to say , but consider the source,


http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=285688&boardID=1&page=#285688

i tend to over inflate grades, because i'm a nice guy and i don't want the girls to lose business, even if she didn't click with me.  also i feel that often it's just a lack of chemistry between her and me and not a lack of skills on her part.

in retrospect it really doesn't help women to get overinflated grades, if there's a deficiency in some area they should know about it.

bottom line is, we should post what we feel, but be civil and objective about it.

ILOVEME(a lot) seems to fit.  I mean really - first you come on the board after the date to whine about it and essentially pre-announce your review.  Now you come back on the board to call attention to yourself and to the review.

No shortage of guys who come across on the board or in their reviews as self appointed experts who think their opinion is more valuable and valid than most others.  Arms must be in slings from all the self back patting.

Indeed consider the source and you posts history  specifically those regarding K-dolls ( though you did recommend a K-Diva as best kisser & for rimming  after condemning unsafe practices in your previous post-that is consistency for you)
 
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewMsg.asp?BoardID=1&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=Lohan&SearchType=1&Author=Ilovewomen&DayFrom=990&DayTo=0&ViewAll=1&MessageID=272237&frmSearch=1&view=1

Being mean spirited , or even malicious , to women in both reviews & posts reflects more on the  misogynistic character of the author  than the performance of the  victims. You have no problem generalizing on reviewers or K-dolls , you have no problem with them reading ( yes they can and do follow the board) your offensive generalizations.

What makes you think that your 9's 10's are any more valid's than those of others ? Or your dismissiveness of K-doll reviewers has any validity ? Were you at the sessions? Or just trying to cast doubt, across the board, in the talent of the K-dolls/Divas and the integrity of their reviewers as if you are the arbitrator of what classifies as a good review.

There is a problem with the scoring system that can be abused , undermined and corrupted however, there is nothing to suggest you are any different from the rest

nar·cis·sism   /ˈnɑrsəˌsɪzɛm/ [nahr-suh-siz-em]
noun
1. inordinate fascination with oneself; excessive self-love; vanity. Synonyms: self-centeredness, smugness, egocentrism.
2. Psychoanalysis . erotic gratification derived from admiration of one's own physical or mental attributes, being a normal condition at the infantile level of personality development.

What support?? Basically comments that have been posted here don't sound like support to me.

A new Messiah.