Who are these people? I put in a review and  they said it wasn`t detailed enough and it sounded like an ad.Is this just a subjective point of view from whoever is working at the time.? I wrote my usual juicy details style and now I have to redo it because of an opinion.I am known for my reviews. Come on I`m freakin Pauliewalnuts here. Dr Gonzo.... any suggestios?

For starters, I unmoderated you :P

paulie, I can not intervene directly and have no access or influence over the review procedures.

But what I CAN do, is flag Admin to look for your incoming "Contact Us". You need to use the  Contact Us tool (top right on the webpage) to express your displeasure. Your response from them will be in your Account Manager / My Feedback within 24-48 hours.

Don't rewrite anything paulie, your rep speaks for itself. Let Admin see the review as it was originally submitted.

Same thing happened to me on a review. It was not posted because someone thought it lacked sufficient details...too vague, etc. I searched and found a half dozen really vague, nondescript reviews and replied with the URLs attached.

Stated that, if I am vague, take a look at these useless reviews...they relented. By the way, my review was full of salient details.

Stick to your guns.

Lancer

This is a man who is known for his lyrical details and his poetic writing style.  Amazing.  I think the people behind the approval system are just sexless creatures who are trying to live vicariously through the reviews so want a blow by blow detail as graphic as possible.  Don't take offense Mr. Walnuts

I've had several reviews denied lately with the same explanation.  Not enuf details.  Been writing them for years.  
It's a drag cuz they are time consuming to write, then to be denied for no clear reason sux.   And I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong, nor do I get a clear explanation when I ask, other than "not enuf details".

They are doing the same thing with me.  i tried to ad my reviews to my profile and admin isn't doing anything about it.

Sorry if this message is a duplicate  I hate PC's when then crash.

I get bored with the run of the mill reviews with the standard acronyms especially for an experience which rocks me.

I recently had a review denied three times.

I wrote a review for an all time experience using a fictitious restaurant and food metaphors in a total parody of an encounter with an awesome gal versus the routine I met her she sucked me and I fucked her approach.

Yes, I included the obligatory acronyms.

The first denial stated that I revealed personal info about the provider  to which I explained it was a fictitious restaurant. They were fooled by my parody.

I resubmitted the review  -- it was denied again stating that I revealed the provider's second occupation.

I resubmitted the review a third time explaining again that this was a total parody.

Their response was

“I would definitely ditch the food/restaurant metaphor.  It isn't written clearly and I think it will give a lot of members the wrong idea.  


Reviews are intended to be detailed descriptions of a session with a provider.  Using a parody adds a layer of decryption for other members who just want to read the session details”.

I was informed that the review approvers are in Amsterdam and are not members.  They look for hard core descriptions and deny creative prose of an awesome encounter.

I also have been told that they are trying to eliminate fake reviews..... but if an established member submits a different take---- please approve  and let's enjoy creativity.


I miss the old days....

I hope I am not penalized for telling the truth

the person reading his reviews lacks a sense of humor.  

The thing to remember with Paulie is just because it sounds unbelievable doesn't mean it didn't happen! Paulie is an artist and the review is his canvas.

Glad to see you're still with us!

you are not above the law...I don't care what kind of local legend you are....  those reviews are there for us to get laid.  I never really cared when guys try to go all artistic anyway....just freaking descirbe the scene and how the girl looks.

Then again, on the now deceased ASPD, if you didn't write like you were writing a review for the fucking Auto Club, your review would not get VIP credit.

I would guess the reviews are auto read, but everyone in the know with TER denies this. Or maybe, the American English style of writing pornography doesn't set well with certain people in Amsterdam/New Delhi/Karachi/wherever.

I have had reviews denied as well as problem reports, even though I know the provider in question personally, etc...it takes like three-four attempts to get through sometimes. Not worth the hassle.

You can always resubmit or appeal it to Admin.

so I figure the review would have been rejected.  Oh well...

I don't have as many reviews as paulie, but I too
got an unapproved reaction to my most recent review,
with NO explanation.  So I shot back a request for them to re-review my review. All of a sudden, my review was approved.  I too, like paulie don't write
wham bam, thank you mam, reviews like some hobbyists
who write like five sentences w/lots of acronyms
just so they can get credit. These reviews are of course entertainment vehicles as well as being informative. So, I too am asking who are these anti-intellectuals who are making these decisions.
There's room for both types of reviews.  I for one
enjoy reading the stories of encounters that take in
the totality of the experience.  

I had to edit my recent review 4 times because mine was not detailed enough regarding physical activities.

I hope your review gets posted lover!!!
Kissez on your dicktip
Sage

thanks to all for the support. Again I write to make it entertaining as well as descriptive and informative.And I know I owe a few ladies reviews.It takes me over an hour to write so sometimes I don`t have enough time and sometimes the dead brain cells from the 60s,70s,& 80s are all I`m working on. Adios

So you prefer a review more like this one?

Didn't click on that...but just prefer a very descriptive review about the girls looks, what happened, the atmosphere.  Some guys try too hard to be artistic and you end up having to wade through dumb quotes from songs or some other "device"...just get to it already.  It's like they're trying to get attention or something...let's not forget what this is...

So I'm thinking it's like in college when a T.A. would grade your report, and it would be weirdly inappropriate given what you KNEW you did and what you expected as a result.  You would then have to appeal to the Prof, who would review and overrule.

Maybe that's what's going on here behind the scenes? The mysterious "ADMIN"-master is farming out the reviewing of reviews to a subordinate... Perhaps to an offshore center to save $?

That's a funny image actually -- a bunch of dwebes in Bangalore reading our "stories" at 10cents a page.

"Look here Pradep, I got one from Wally Paulnuts and it is very much entertainingment but it is 4.2 adjectives short according to instructions!"