Men see who they want to see, they aren't influenced by other guys, girls or lists. their dicks do the picking.
10 reviews, 100 reviews or 1 review makes no difference on who's going to book time with whom.

i wouldn't spend to much time worrying about it or what criteria goes into making it. Waste of time you could be spending getting laid

xoxo
Jenny

I agree. A lot of those ratings are from hobbyists who give higher ratings
than what is deserved just not to piss off the provider. They may want to
come back so why give a 6 or 7 and no longer be welcomed.
Believe me I've seen 9's and 10's who have made me very skeptical
of the ratings system.  Please! Are there really that many 10's out  there?
Just go out and get laid and don't complain.

than say someone with a minimal amount of reviews to hold a high average..
I personally think it creates more friction between providers..(an additional downside).
that I dont like.. Though a bit of competitiveness is fun..wink.. yet, not if it becomes overkill..
I must add I thought the 2nd version of top 100 providers was more accurate when Nikki Avalon and Piper were on top.. it seemed to just be more appropriate in the true form of top providers..
my 2 cents..
yes in the regional top 100 does not seem to be any more accurate in my book.. nothing against the ladies.. I just feel there may need to be a bit of tweaking as with anything new or starting out..
sincerely
Lovely Lorena

Exactly mufftime ,Its what i said in a previous post .They give the girls ahigh score just so they dont get blackballed by the girl . Id say 10 percent of the girls are truly fine .

There could be 100 different iterations of the top 100.  Just keep it simple as it is now.  5 reviews is a good number.  Look, sorry to the girls that have over 100 reviews, if some hot new girl comes along and bumps you down one spot.  Who cares really?  Is it that important?  Really, it's the content of reviews that matters most, not the numbers.

xoxo to you !!
I look forward to proving it to you. maybe for a certain ladys birthday.. wink..
LL

When the beta version of the new format was out, the top 100 were ranked solely on the total number of reviews. This told us nothing except who is most experienced. It included reviews 10 years old. Now the top rankings can be reached with 2 or 3 reviews which does not make ense either. I think Mathesar had it right when he only rated those with 10 reviews in the past 12 months.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Jones_Industrial_Average

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_average

In any sport current playing stats
are what counts.

In other words, what you did yesterday is not as imp as what you are doing today.


I feel if you use the last 20 to 40 most current reviews or pick a # - everyone could be included in the new review system both new gals and gals that have been around a while with a track record.

One person may score less or more in the begg and then either her skills erode or they pick up.

I feel if you pick a # of reviews based on the most current reviews that would give recent reviews the most credibility rather than older reviews which could have been better or worse depending on whether the girl picked up her game or not.

As far as fairness goes - now everyone who has say 40 reviews or pick a # - can be rated on their most current review scores .

Ur welcome;I like your ideas too !
Have a great weekend..xx

Wow this top 100 list sure did create a lot of controversy.  How about just abolishing it completely?

As it is now, it is easy to understand.  The tipping point is 5 reviews.  Less than that, and a provider could have all 10/10 reviews, but not make the list.  Once a provider has 5 reviews, the ranking is based on the average (or arithmetic mean) of their scores for looks / performance, and is "weighted" in a way, because if there is a "tie", the provider with more reviews will be ranked higher.  

There is a reason it makes very much sense to keep it the way it is.  Many girls have a limited and often too short a time in L.A.  As you know, only about 10% of the customers a girl sees will post reviews. So a new girl who just started providing here, will need to see about 50 customers, just to get 5 reviews! Damn, that's a lot of guy-traffic.   If you increase the number of reviews needed to make it onto the top 100 list, then those girls, who might be fantastic providers won't ever make the list.  So keeping the number needed at "5" makes good sense.

But one change could be to sort out providers who have no reviews in the past 90 or 120 days, essentially they are "inactive".  Unless this list is a "hall of fame", which doesn't seem to be the intent, then removing inactive providers makes sense.